Considering the fact that Iran_N had AASI, Natufian and SSA shift, it's hard to believe that it looked similar to ANF and CHG.
You've already posted those pictures.shall i post pics of people who according to my analysis are roughly what Iran N looked like ? or not . because if nobody will read what i say or care then i dont want to bother
I keep an open mind and use a little skepticism. My science background makes me want to verify what others have concluded.Natufian is associated with the SSA. discussion is over
There aren't that many folks here to see or read our wonderful handiwork.shall i post pics of people who according to my analysis are roughly what Iran N looked like ? or not . because if nobody will read what i say or care then i dont want to bother
Okay, thank you. I have yet to use qpAdm. This is someone's effort using qpAdm. Is it accurate? I have been using G25, and I had found that Central, West and North Europeans have neither IRN_N nor Natufian ancestry. Yet this man's qpAdm shows that all Europeans have IRN_N ancestry.Through qpAdm. The shift is also evident on G25.

Okay, thank you. I have yet to use qpAdm. This is someone's effort using qpAdm. Is it accurate? I have been using G25, and I had found that Central, West and North Europeans have neither IRN_N nor Natufian ancestry. Yet this man's qpAdm shows that all Europeans have IRN_N ancestry.View attachment 6319
Francisco Franco was a quarter gypsitalian that’s the why he have an Arabid phenotype
So georgian do get only 30% CHG after all. My perception of populations have changed from now on.
How come Assyrians have the same EHG as you on that calcit seems this calculator : https://www.anthroworldforum.com/threads/post-your-puntdnal-k12-near-east-results.732/
gives the closest results to qpAdm . it lacks CHG unfortunately but the lack of it get compromised by other components . here the spreadsheet : http://up.picr.de/44604697bl.jpg?rand=1666986494
How come Assyrians have the same EHG as you on that calc
It's not as accurate as you thought don't you think.¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Depends on how you define "North Africa" but negroid-like skulls were found all over the Sahara and the SSA-like ancestors of Iberomaurusians certainly would have looked "black" by our standards. Also Nazlet Khater in Egypt was described as negroid.Say what you want, friend. I don't agree. The Sahara was a formidble barrier for those tropical SSAs and even during the green periods, the SSAs didn't penetrate that far north. It might surprise you, but SSAs are not indigenous to North Africa, they are immigrants. The Europeans in South Africa are immigrants, but so are most of the SSAs there, the Zulu, the Xhosa, the indigenous people are Khoi Khoi and San.
There is a problem with his average moroccan since the average certainly do not have only 13% IAM and 20% SSA wtfOkay, thank you. I have yet to use qpAdm. This is someone's effort using qpAdm. Is it accurate? I have been using G25, and I had found that Central, West and North Europeans have neither IRN_N nor Natufian ancestry. Yet this man's qpAdm shows that all Europeans have IRN_N ancestry.View attachment 6319
| Average | 0.02643019 | • | 42.0 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 7.4 | 31.3 | 1.1 | 8.1 | 6.6 |
There is a problem with his average moroccan since the average certainly do not have only 13% IAM and 20% SSA wtf
Average based on 86 samples from all over Morocco is : 42 % ANF, 0.7% Dinka, 1.1% CHG, 1.6% Iran_N, 7.4% natufian, 31.3% IBM/IAM, 1.1% WHG, 8.1% steppe (yamna) and 6.6% Yoruba
Average 0.02643019 • 42.0 0.7 1.1 1.6 7.4 31.3 1.1 8.1 6.6