Search results

whatsup

where do you keep finding these idiotic calcs

bad calc. fucking irantalk

Maj be trollin

you should not take aw reconstructions seriously. neither chg nor iran_n would have looked like this in my opinion. the vibes are off

semitic avicenna

they would use it as a proof against us to call us "complexed middle easterners" . shitheads

like you said before with that currycel blake sock as he was calling me yalla habibi n shiet they have nothing to lose by saying such bs things about us. it's comical that such things would come out of their mouths when they themselves look the way they do and would do anything to have the same...

natufian was white n shiet. they have some recently acquired mutations

isnt that tianyuan reconstruction? ancestralwhispers is a joke

why are we getting hate for saying things the way they really are. i'll never understand

iran_ln was georgian-like phenotypically. the 5% rule that applies to s-indian component from harappaworld would make many ganj dareh, wezmeh, tepe abdul husein and other neolithic iranian samples baloch like (but less curryoid looking because baloch on average score 12% s-indian iirc). kurds...

you pieces of shits onge are black but they are not negroid pajeets are white but they are australoid etc

no. even that andrei dude says that this yseq is the worst tool

according to you we are brown anyway so whats the point

south asians are brown and west asians are more similar to euros racially than to south asians. so it's contradictory to put west asians in the same category as south asians but separate them from euros

lol..

what i am about to say may be a bit controversial especially in the eyes of cockblockers and annoying fucks but iran_N/zagrosian probably looked more similar to georgians & CHG than baloch

he passes as bulgarian as well albeit as a woggier one probably ..

i still sometimes wonder if there is an individual overlap between northern levantines like lebanese and west/north syrians and georgians