Search results

has avicenna made any accusations these past couple of days or has he been quiet about it

has anyone called you a whitewasher recently or are you referring to all the times you have been called a whitewasher

In a nutshell

Target: Ror Distance: 3.4663% / 0.03466255 36.4 Iran_N 28.8 EHG 16.8 AASI 10.6 EEF_Balkan_N 7.4 Caucasus_HG on paper they should not be that exotic looking but 17% AASI is more than enough to do plenty of damage which is why the most northern shifted south asian group still looks...

it's not like punjis don't have sintashta. pashtuns have more iirc and have less AASI/s-indian than punjabis and even Ror who are the most northern shifted pajeet group. in general AASI and any other non-west eurasian component has a far stronger effect on phenotype than sintashta or any other...

he does look maghrebi

Zoro claims to be Kurdish yet in his own words here is his racial breakdown: 74.31% W. Eurasian + 11.42% E. Eurasian + 5.42% S. Eurasian + 8.85% Basal Eurasian/African No northern west asian person is racially similar to something like this.. either zoro is capping with this breakdown or he...

@Corduene Look at this bullshit https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?333986-NW-Iranians-look-Kurdish-and-NE-Iranians-look-Afghan&p=6925135&viewfull=1#post6925135 also lol at that "mena" sock account

I guess you are right. This one surely has high pajeet. but the ones with 0% AASI would be the best proxies to Iran_N after Hotu or Belt Cave samples. but the thing is that we have just as much ancestry from Iran_Meso as from Iran_N Target: Turkmenistan_Gonur_BA_2 Distance: 4.1356% /...

most of their reconstructions don't make sense. but curryoid or not I doubt BMAC looked they way AWH depicts them

well.. these BMAC reconstructions are horseshit. Because as you can see by DNA there is no reason for them to have looked curryoid or as exotic as these reconstructions make them to be. Ancestralwhispers strikes again. I noticed that if you lighten up this Iran Mesolithic female reconstruction...

because they don't have AASI? and they are as Iran_N as Balochis are. On top of it other than Iran_N they have CHG, EEF and a tiny bit EHG. For sure they would be more similar to Iran_N than Balochis are

pretty sure there are many individuals iranians from the aforementioned regions who will score even more s-indian than these averages here

how similar are pashtuns and tajiks in terms of appearance

Do we have a reconstruction of BMAC because they would have been a better proxy for Iran_N than Baloch are Target: Turkmenistan_LBA_Parkhai Distance: 2.8950% / 0.02894966 61.8 Iran_N 22.6 Caucasus_HG 12.6 EEF_Balkan_N 3.0 EHG

are you saying that pashtuns and tajiks while being relatively close to each other in the oracles differ significantly when it comes to appearance

I may be mistaken but don't most Afghans have a reasonably close distance to far NW South Asian groups? If that's ghe the case then why do these OWD afghans behave like bitches when you bring up facts that there is an overlap between pashtuns and other afghan ethnic groups and NW South Asians

it all makes sense in the end because you have people from kermanshah or whatever who score close to 4% AASI and they look very different from NWA..

as you have said recently they have gone a step further and now they use sintashta steppe shit as an excuse to cope and force overlap with northern euros lel. the ridiculousness of these people. but they can't try to portray themselves as an ethnicity that overlaps with NWA lookwise and...

anyway if we conclude that 5% and above s-indian puts someone in the danger zone that we should lower the standards and the level for pure AASI at 4% or so. so if anyone gets modeled with roughly 4% AASI then there is a pretty good chance they will look curryoid