Search results

the point here is that iran_n is not the cause for why he still looks paki . the issue here is thar many people will blame iran_n for that guy's paki looks while overlooking his 1/4 aasi admix

your average poster on this sub will disregard 25% aasi and look at his 52% iran_n and say that his appearance is due to him scoring very high iran_n nevermind that he is 1/4 aasi

dont let the trolls bring your spirit down then. you should know by now that those fuckers will feast on your blood as if they were fucking vampires from twilight

why are you avidly sandniggerifying yourself when it's easily visible to the naked eye that you fall in the same pheno spectrum as this guy in OP with minimal differences on the overall face and pigmentation

i dont see no particular sandnigger drift in your face compared to his. neither in the coloring

i'll probably hit him up with a pm later

the way that he placed you was meh. not great but not terrible. things got worse towards the end :d

natufian was less basal eurasian than chg and iran_n right? i wonder if this saudi person who scores 73% natufian will look less exotic than someone who scores a lot of chg and iran_n ( in case of iran_n, someone who is minimally aasi admixed or shows no aasi influence phenotypically)...

eastern armenian person who gets modeled almost identically to me. nwa peoplez Target: PolarBear360_scaled Distance: 3.3787% / 0.03378674 36.8 EEF_Balkan_N 29.8 Caucasus_HG 21.2 Iran_N 9.2 Natufian_HG 3.0 EHG Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 3.7244% / 0.03724432 37.6...

ever since you banned bestuwaifu, tiglat has decided to make a comeback as a mascot of this forum

@Corduene thought process of an average redditor in the genetics sections

my grandparents are very old so i don't care about them type shit

@caucasiodbutnotwhite

no one gives a shit about all those factors that influence the way most baloch look (noncurryoid ones excluded) they are either dishonest and are trying to bend the truth or they never gave a thought to these factors

everytime we see morons say that baloch are the best proxy for iran_n (even though they have curryoid baloch in mind ) we should show them these baloch instead. i am fed up with them claiming that iran_n was this pajeetoid hairy wogs who make baloch look exotic because they have the most iran_n...

they dont even consider 1.9/1.7 a good fit anymore. In their minds the fit has to be <=1 to qualify

doesnt that hotu reconstruction look a bit swarthier though? either way i cant help but to not take these ancestralwhisper reconstructions seriously dude looks like a motherfucker

you really think that this proto yamnaya reconstruction from chechnya made by ancestralwhispers is a good proxy to iran_n?

@Corduene someone's reply from reddit in defence of iron age/bronze age models on g25 while criticizing neo-meso models. what are your thoughts etc "It sucks ass if it’s not used correctly yeah. You have to be careful choosing the sources and few ones as well. Otherwise you end up with a mess...

which post man. there seem to be a dozen of them