by the way 2 days ago or so i have discussed with a pajeet on reddit about Iran N and also about s-indian from harappa etc.
i told him that ben dover and me came to the result that above 5% s-indian will often show the higher the score the higher the likeliness . pajeet didnt like it and then said if that was the case then yaghnobis would look south asian with their 5% s-indian but they dont .
i would need to check how much yaghnobis actually score but lets say it is 5% . he said this would disprove my thesis . i said it is the contrary ....this actually PROVES my thesis and plays on my part . because i said ABOVE 5% the more the more . and i said that the reason why northwest indians look pajeet but yaghnobis dont is EXACTLY BECAUSE OF THE S-INDIAN ....and also because of climate of course . what the fuck would it else be . and he then said "northwest indians are 22-25 % s-indian lol " .....yeah but only Rors and Khamboj or something . both are fringe indians . punjabis and kashmiris are 30 - 35 %
but there is something that caught my attention . and member idklolimo was telling me this too today :
we noticed that pajeets will often say things like "yaghnobis dont look south asian" , "lol look at pashtuns they have 10% AASI but dont look south asian" etc. . , "lol even punjabis are somewhat foreign for rest of india" etc.
but lets stay with what the pajeet on reddit told me 2 days ago that yaghnobis are 5% s-indian but dont look south asian . oh ok and we Kurds with our 2.2 % s-indian , with being 1000000km far from south asia , with our high med genes that curries dont have , with our higher CHG etc. etc. . we DO look south asian ? thats what pajeets love to claim dont they ? they love to pass Kurds as curries . but then they say yaghnobis dont look curry . how do we then ? that doesnt make any sense
these people need to be put in chains and beaten up . yes serious and yes i would do it