Edo Nyland wrote:
I think we have to go back one more step, to the language which
underlies all Indo-European, Semitic and Turkish languages. This
ancient language is now well accepted in Europe as being an earlier
form of Basque, the language spoken during the thousands of years the
Goddess religion held sway over North Africa, western Asia and all of
Europe. Colin Renfrew wrote in "The Human Inheritance" (1999): "the
Basque language may be regarded as the only early and indigenous
language of Europe" (p.27). Many linguists in Germany have now
endorsed this position. Edo Nyland saying that, "Colin Renfrew wrote that "the Basque language may be regarded as the only early and indigenous language of Europe"Many linguists in Germany have now endorsed this position"
This game has been played at least since the days of Babylon, the
center of confusion, intrigues and cabalistic activities. It seems
that this game is still being played under the guise of "linguistic
research" in order to get the Basque/Turkish language out of the way once and
for all. Fortunately Basque/Turkish has survived many such games since very
ancient times. The whole issue revolves more around politics than
science.
Unfortunately most of the innocent and honest linguistic researchers
have been led astray to search for an imaginary "proto" (birata)
language while the actual "proto" language is still around. Those who
know the real situation have not been candid and have taken the easy
way out by being lull. In most of their efforts they have tried to
villify the Turs/Turks(Basques not today's Turks sorry) and attribute their ancient magnificent
civilization and language to others - again under the guise
of "scientific research". The invention of judeo-christianity lies at
the root of all this confusion.
The present Basque language is also known by the name EUSKARA.
Unfortunately, EUSKARA, in its present state, is already a mutilated
language - just like Indo-European languages. Edo Nyland correctly
believes that religious linguists were the ones who manufactured the
I-E languages however he probably does not know that EUSKARA itself is
already an anagrammatized language, i.e., not being like its original
Turkish self. In spite of the mutilation, the Basque (EUSKARA)
language still contains the remnants of Turkish in it. The Basque
people, being one of the early natives of Europe (just like for
example, the Etruscans, Pelasgians and Thracians etc.), were Basque/Turkish
speaking Turanian people. The reason that they have been tolerated intact in their
present geography, i.e., as an island in the middle of christian
Europe/, may be due to their religious beliefs.
Thus the name EUSKARA indicates that Basque people were OGUZ people,
that is, Turkish speaking OGUZ people from the very beginning but the origin of turkish and any language is basque.
The meaning of all this is that the EUSKARA (BASQUE) people were
either originally "Black Moon" believers themselves, and therefore
were saved as a distinct group because their belief was similar withj udeo-christianity, or they were forcefully converted to Christianity
and thus took on this name to escape christian persecution. Hence,
they became one of the christians. But with their Turanian Turkic
speaking background they were able to resist total assimilation by christianity more or less retaining their Turanian self identity.
However, their language has gone through mutilation by the Christian
religious linguists and has been anagrammatized into its present
form. Therefore its present form is not its original Turkish state.
Edo Nyland himself writes how the native peoples of Europe were
exterminated by the zealous Christian rulers. So much so that even
women and children were mass exterminated in order to eliminate the
ancient native Turanian religion and traditions from the face of
Europe. Of course, those who could save their heads were the ones
that changed their self identity, name, language and religious
affiliation from the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ religion to christianity. The Basques were one of the saved ones.
We have another Turkish people who were converted to believe in
"Black-Moon (Kara-Ay) by way of Judaism. They are the remnants of the
Turkish Hazar Empire which had a life duration of about six hundred
years (between about 600-1200 A.D.) becoming another shining Turkish
star of Asia and Europe. Some of their rulers (Kagans), and part of
the population, were converted to Judaism. The present day Turkish
"KARAIMS" are their remnants. The name "KARAIM" is a disguised form
of Turkish name "KARA-AYIM" meaning "I am Black Moon [believer]".
Thus the name expresses, in a disguised way, the religious affliation
of these Turkish people to the "Black-Moon" believers, that is,
Judaism. Black is also the colour of the Judeo-Christianity belief.
So the name KARAIM is another name like EUSKARA.
Replacing a Turkish name by another name is an ancient trick to
obliterate the Turs/Turks and their Turkish language further. For
example, this is evident when the Spanish and the French refer to the
EUSKARA people as "VASCO" and "BASQUE" respectively. In spite of
their efforts to apply encrypted names to the EUSKARA people though,
the Turkish OGUZ/OKUS is still embedded in VASCO and BASQUE with B to
V and U to V changes.
> Edo Nyland said:
> This also means that there is and never was, a family of Indo-
European languages because they were all invented by religious
linguists, even Sanskrit. My book "Linguistic Archaeology" (2001)
explains it all in detail, how the monks made up all languages of
Europe using the Basque dictionary, without any exception. My book
may be obtained by going to: www.trafford.com/robots/01-0069.html
Polat Kaya: I agree with Edo Nyland that the so-called "Indo-European"
languages were manufactured by religious linguists but one very
important point needs clarification, i.e., that monks used the Basque
dictionary to make up the languages of Europe. The term "Basque" is an
anagram of Oguz, hence is incorrect and misleading in that form
because the OGUZ name has been obliterated and is replaced with
something else alien. Additionally, the real name of Basque people is
"EUSKARA" which is Turkish "OGUZ KARA" indicating that the language is
an OGUZ language. If there was a dictionary used by
the monks, then referring to that "dictionary" as a "Basque
dictionary" is misleading because it separates (alienates) the ethnic
identity of the EUSKARA (so-called "Basque") people from the Oguz
Turkic people. In plain language, it is divide and alienate. So when
Edo Nyland says that Indo-European languages were manufactured from an
earlier form of Basque, he is actually saying in a roundabout way that
Indo-European languages were manufactured from Turkish(but Basque is the origin of Turkish so deal with it.You want Basque to come from Turkish and it is the other way around) and thus is
supporting my view without directly saying so.
As I said above, the ancient form of Basque was Turkish and that is
what the monks were using to make up the languages of Europe. By
referring to these people as "Basque" rather than "OGUZ" or "OKUS",
their Turkic identity was intentionally confused. That is what the
confusion of languages, referred to in Genesis 11, is all about.
Additionally, the so-called "Basque" (Oguz) language, used by the
monks, was not the only Turkish dialect used in Europe. All of the
native peoples of Europe were Turkish speaking Turanian peoples. This
is what Christianity wiped out - by confusing their native language,
by changing the religion of the natives, by altering their names and
even by persecution and genocide.
>From the transcript of a NOVA program on the languages of the world,
we have the following picture regarding the native North American
speakers of Salish as presented by Peter Thomas:
"Historically, Salishan was one of the most extensive language
families of the Northwest. Linguists believe there were no fewer than
twenty-three distinct languages in the family. By the eighteenth
century, at least one hundred thousand speakers spread over twenty-two
million acres, from southern British Columbia to western Montana.
Then, Salish speakers had their first encounter with whites, a
friendly meeting with Lewis and Clark in 1805. Gradually, Native
American communities came under the influence of the settlers and
missionaries that soon followed. The jesuits were the first "black
robes" to live among the Salish. Initially, they were welcomed. Adults
went to church and children went to their boarding schools. But
tensions mounted as priests demanded that the Salish children speak
English, forbidding them to use their native tongue. It took only a
hundred years for a language which had thrived for millennia to be on
the verge of extinction."
This is what Genesis 11 is all about - confusion and obliteration of
language. In one hundred years, the Jesuits ("black robes" the impostors of Madrid) wiped out
a language that had existed for a very long time. Jesuits were not the
only "black robes" who did this kind of destruction, there were all
kinds of other "black robes" everywhere doing the same thing. The
religious missionaries were executing a religious command they
attributed to God himself - who we all know does not actually talk to
anyone and therefore did not give such instruction. In reality, that
command was actually coming from the cabalist religious groups of
ancient times who wanted to confuse (destroy) that ancient one
language that the world spoke (i.e., Turkish=Basque). The same thing was
done to all the natives of Europe, the Middle East and most everywhere
else. In the process, they also killed countless native peoples
wherever they resisted.
Alcudia, Mallorca.
I think we have to go back one more step, to the language which
underlies all Indo-European, Semitic and Turkish languages. This
ancient language is now well accepted in Europe as being an earlier
form of Basque, the language spoken during the thousands of years the
Goddess religion held sway over North Africa, western Asia and all of
Europe. Colin Renfrew wrote in "The Human Inheritance" (1999): "the
Basque language may be regarded as the only early and indigenous
language of Europe" (p.27). Many linguists in Germany have now
endorsed this position. Edo Nyland saying that, "Colin Renfrew wrote that "the Basque language may be regarded as the only early and indigenous language of Europe"Many linguists in Germany have now endorsed this position"
This game has been played at least since the days of Babylon, the
center of confusion, intrigues and cabalistic activities. It seems
that this game is still being played under the guise of "linguistic
research" in order to get the Basque/Turkish language out of the way once and
for all. Fortunately Basque/Turkish has survived many such games since very
ancient times. The whole issue revolves more around politics than
science.
Unfortunately most of the innocent and honest linguistic researchers
have been led astray to search for an imaginary "proto" (birata)
language while the actual "proto" language is still around. Those who
know the real situation have not been candid and have taken the easy
way out by being lull. In most of their efforts they have tried to
villify the Turs/Turks(Basques not today's Turks sorry) and attribute their ancient magnificent
civilization and language to others - again under the guise
of "scientific research". The invention of judeo-christianity lies at
the root of all this confusion.
The present Basque language is also known by the name EUSKARA.
Unfortunately, EUSKARA, in its present state, is already a mutilated
language - just like Indo-European languages. Edo Nyland correctly
believes that religious linguists were the ones who manufactured the
I-E languages however he probably does not know that EUSKARA itself is
already an anagrammatized language, i.e., not being like its original
Turkish self. In spite of the mutilation, the Basque (EUSKARA)
language still contains the remnants of Turkish in it. The Basque
people, being one of the early natives of Europe (just like for
example, the Etruscans, Pelasgians and Thracians etc.), were Basque/Turkish
speaking Turanian people. The reason that they have been tolerated intact in their
present geography, i.e., as an island in the middle of christian
Europe/, may be due to their religious beliefs.
Thus the name EUSKARA indicates that Basque people were OGUZ people,
that is, Turkish speaking OGUZ people from the very beginning but the origin of turkish and any language is basque.
The meaning of all this is that the EUSKARA (BASQUE) people were
either originally "Black Moon" believers themselves, and therefore
were saved as a distinct group because their belief was similar withj udeo-christianity, or they were forcefully converted to Christianity
and thus took on this name to escape christian persecution. Hence,
they became one of the christians. But with their Turanian Turkic
speaking background they were able to resist total assimilation by christianity more or less retaining their Turanian self identity.
However, their language has gone through mutilation by the Christian
religious linguists and has been anagrammatized into its present
form. Therefore its present form is not its original Turkish state.
Edo Nyland himself writes how the native peoples of Europe were
exterminated by the zealous Christian rulers. So much so that even
women and children were mass exterminated in order to eliminate the
ancient native Turanian religion and traditions from the face of
Europe. Of course, those who could save their heads were the ones
that changed their self identity, name, language and religious
affiliation from the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ religion to christianity. The Basques were one of the saved ones.
We have another Turkish people who were converted to believe in
"Black-Moon (Kara-Ay) by way of Judaism. They are the remnants of the
Turkish Hazar Empire which had a life duration of about six hundred
years (between about 600-1200 A.D.) becoming another shining Turkish
star of Asia and Europe. Some of their rulers (Kagans), and part of
the population, were converted to Judaism. The present day Turkish
"KARAIMS" are their remnants. The name "KARAIM" is a disguised form
of Turkish name "KARA-AYIM" meaning "I am Black Moon [believer]".
Thus the name expresses, in a disguised way, the religious affliation
of these Turkish people to the "Black-Moon" believers, that is,
Judaism. Black is also the colour of the Judeo-Christianity belief.
So the name KARAIM is another name like EUSKARA.
Replacing a Turkish name by another name is an ancient trick to
obliterate the Turs/Turks and their Turkish language further. For
example, this is evident when the Spanish and the French refer to the
EUSKARA people as "VASCO" and "BASQUE" respectively. In spite of
their efforts to apply encrypted names to the EUSKARA people though,
the Turkish OGUZ/OKUS is still embedded in VASCO and BASQUE with B to
V and U to V changes.
> Edo Nyland said:
> This also means that there is and never was, a family of Indo-
European languages because they were all invented by religious
linguists, even Sanskrit. My book "Linguistic Archaeology" (2001)
explains it all in detail, how the monks made up all languages of
Europe using the Basque dictionary, without any exception. My book
may be obtained by going to: www.trafford.com/robots/01-0069.html
Polat Kaya: I agree with Edo Nyland that the so-called "Indo-European"
languages were manufactured by religious linguists but one very
important point needs clarification, i.e., that monks used the Basque
dictionary to make up the languages of Europe. The term "Basque" is an
anagram of Oguz, hence is incorrect and misleading in that form
because the OGUZ name has been obliterated and is replaced with
something else alien. Additionally, the real name of Basque people is
"EUSKARA" which is Turkish "OGUZ KARA" indicating that the language is
an OGUZ language. If there was a dictionary used by
the monks, then referring to that "dictionary" as a "Basque
dictionary" is misleading because it separates (alienates) the ethnic
identity of the EUSKARA (so-called "Basque") people from the Oguz
Turkic people. In plain language, it is divide and alienate. So when
Edo Nyland says that Indo-European languages were manufactured from an
earlier form of Basque, he is actually saying in a roundabout way that
Indo-European languages were manufactured from Turkish(but Basque is the origin of Turkish so deal with it.You want Basque to come from Turkish and it is the other way around) and thus is
supporting my view without directly saying so.
As I said above, the ancient form of Basque was Turkish and that is
what the monks were using to make up the languages of Europe. By
referring to these people as "Basque" rather than "OGUZ" or "OKUS",
their Turkic identity was intentionally confused. That is what the
confusion of languages, referred to in Genesis 11, is all about.
Additionally, the so-called "Basque" (Oguz) language, used by the
monks, was not the only Turkish dialect used in Europe. All of the
native peoples of Europe were Turkish speaking Turanian peoples. This
is what Christianity wiped out - by confusing their native language,
by changing the religion of the natives, by altering their names and
even by persecution and genocide.
>From the transcript of a NOVA program on the languages of the world,
we have the following picture regarding the native North American
speakers of Salish as presented by Peter Thomas:
"Historically, Salishan was one of the most extensive language
families of the Northwest. Linguists believe there were no fewer than
twenty-three distinct languages in the family. By the eighteenth
century, at least one hundred thousand speakers spread over twenty-two
million acres, from southern British Columbia to western Montana.
Then, Salish speakers had their first encounter with whites, a
friendly meeting with Lewis and Clark in 1805. Gradually, Native
American communities came under the influence of the settlers and
missionaries that soon followed. The jesuits were the first "black
robes" to live among the Salish. Initially, they were welcomed. Adults
went to church and children went to their boarding schools. But
tensions mounted as priests demanded that the Salish children speak
English, forbidding them to use their native tongue. It took only a
hundred years for a language which had thrived for millennia to be on
the verge of extinction."
This is what Genesis 11 is all about - confusion and obliteration of
language. In one hundred years, the Jesuits ("black robes" the impostors of Madrid) wiped out
a language that had existed for a very long time. Jesuits were not the
only "black robes" who did this kind of destruction, there were all
kinds of other "black robes" everywhere doing the same thing. The
religious missionaries were executing a religious command they
attributed to God himself - who we all know does not actually talk to
anyone and therefore did not give such instruction. In reality, that
command was actually coming from the cabalist religious groups of
ancient times who wanted to confuse (destroy) that ancient one
language that the world spoke (i.e., Turkish=Basque). The same thing was
done to all the natives of Europe, the Middle East and most everywhere
else. In the process, they also killed countless native peoples
wherever they resisted.
Alcudia, Mallorca.
Last edited:
![51ZqU2sRdfL._SY342_[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18788-98e1d8cce9ce00e5d4d88ad87970ed4a.jpg "51ZqU2sRdfL._SY342_[1].jpg")
![360_F_827833617_t8OiBFo5VtirLHScBzPdbNOHwAyQxwRP[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18805-13996dd2d965209227853cd5f9dbd325.jpg "360_F_827833617_t8OiBFo5VtirLHScBzPdbNOHwAyQxwRP[1].jpg")
![800px-Model_of_'The_Michael',_Newhaven_Primary_School,_Edinburgh[1].JPG](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18806-e9b2a349fbb19632dca34e88e7e3970d.jpg "800px-Model_of_'The_Michael',_Newhaven_Primary_School,_Edinburgh[1].JPG")
![unnamed[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18810-6e7d24e1996afbdcc3bb6e4947d5b3f9.jpg "unnamed[1].jpg")
![caption[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18821-576c470a0657945dc755d0c89ecf2a32.jpg "caption[1].jpg")
![new-york-at-night-skyview[2].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18826-1bf9bc819e8e95f8218c777059b8fee6.jpg "new-york-at-night-skyview[2].jpg")
![gettyimages-688899881-1519413300[1].jpeg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18824-b396e4434e2a5f9f2220a5d686bed48a.jpg "gettyimages-688899881-1519413300[1].jpeg")
![2388668923_39b96452a0_b[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18823-254b39f26d50f40518eb51e822d66f3d.jpg "2388668923_39b96452a0_b[1].jpg")
![lower-manhattan-skyline[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18822-a11d3afa43ca27f331230e43ad1d82f8.jpg "lower-manhattan-skyline[1].jpg")
![new-york-cityscape-aerial[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18827-433d22c4e7d4a9528de97405d4dbff5b.jpg "new-york-cityscape-aerial[1].jpg")
![800px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Board_of_War_and_Ordnance.svg[1].png](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18831-e9e995c25dc7ead455f139d892a80031.jpg "800px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Board_of_War_and_Ordnance.svg[1].png")
![U.S.+Department+of+the+Army+DA+Seal1.5[1].png](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18832-262d4cdb4cb55067588fce351c773e1f.jpg "U.S.+Department+of+the+Army+DA+Seal1.5[1].png")
![new-york-at-night-skyview[1].jpg](/data/attachments/18/18825-1bf9bc819e8e95f8218c777059b8fee6.jpg)
![800px-Map_of_territorial_growth_1775.svg[1].png](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18856-71ed6ae9e32461cba4b102c75ac3af8e.jpg "800px-Map_of_territorial_growth_1775.svg[1].png")
![800px-Seal_of_North_Carolina.svg[1].png](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18857-aa93027582fd98ad0b2147eab3ce0518.jpg "800px-Seal_of_North_Carolina.svg[1].png")
![maxresdefault[1].jpg](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18867-9fbfef4be3b6fde35cd40ae55227031a.jpg "maxresdefault[1].jpg")
![800px-Coat_of_arms_of_Cuba.svg[1].png](https://www.anthroworldforum.com/data/attachments/18/18886-be4c7fdc839bb101855512e98f93e260.jpg "800px-Coat_of_arms_of_Cuba.svg[1].png")
