ok so this is just for fun but it shows some nice things
in this calculator you can see the AASI of people like Balochs , Pashtuns , north Indians , and even some Persians very clearly
and that we Kurds do NOT have any ....as usual . and that Iran N is NOT an "exotic" component that turns people into indian looking or something . and that you can NOT base Iran N on Balochs lookwise because they score around 10% AASI as you see . AASI peaks in south indian tribals and is a very dark and exotic component which is the reason why there are even many balochs and even some persians who look indian like
i have used these components :
French_Corsican individuals to cover our non Iran N parts mostly Mediterranean . Coriscans also score a tiny bit Iran N and some CHG . the latter is good because it will add to give our CHG ancestry . corsicans also have EHG and WHG which is also good because we Kurds also have some . so the Corsican samples give us Kurds almost everything we need aside of Iran N
Latvian : since south asians have only little to none mediterranean farmer and more EHG related ancestry the corsican samples wont be that good of a fit . with Latvian added it works better
Iran Seh Gabi LN and also 2 Iran Ganj Dareh N individuals . all 3 of these neolithic Iranian samples have the least AASI shift relative to CHG out of all Iran N . Iran N in general has a little shift to Natufian and aasi RELATIVE TO CHG . caused by genetic drift of ancient populations . but these 3 i use for this calculator have the least . and the Seh Gabi LN has the biggest Natufian shift compared to CHG out of all Iran N . this is good because it covers our couple of percent Natufian too without the need to use Natufian
SSA populations :
East Eurasian populations :
and AASI . peaking in south indian tribals
here is the model : https://justpaste.it/5ksvg#
vahaduo : https://vahaduo.github.io/vahaduo/
in this calculator you can see the AASI of people like Balochs , Pashtuns , north Indians , and even some Persians very clearly
and that we Kurds do NOT have any ....as usual . and that Iran N is NOT an "exotic" component that turns people into indian looking or something . and that you can NOT base Iran N on Balochs lookwise because they score around 10% AASI as you see . AASI peaks in south indian tribals and is a very dark and exotic component which is the reason why there are even many balochs and even some persians who look indian like
i have used these components :
French_Corsican individuals to cover our non Iran N parts mostly Mediterranean . Coriscans also score a tiny bit Iran N and some CHG . the latter is good because it will add to give our CHG ancestry . corsicans also have EHG and WHG which is also good because we Kurds also have some . so the Corsican samples give us Kurds almost everything we need aside of Iran N
Latvian : since south asians have only little to none mediterranean farmer and more EHG related ancestry the corsican samples wont be that good of a fit . with Latvian added it works better
Iran Seh Gabi LN and also 2 Iran Ganj Dareh N individuals . all 3 of these neolithic Iranian samples have the least AASI shift relative to CHG out of all Iran N . Iran N in general has a little shift to Natufian and aasi RELATIVE TO CHG . caused by genetic drift of ancient populations . but these 3 i use for this calculator have the least . and the Seh Gabi LN has the biggest Natufian shift compared to CHG out of all Iran N . this is good because it covers our couple of percent Natufian too without the need to use Natufian
SSA populations :
East Eurasian populations :
and AASI . peaking in south indian tribals
here is the model : https://justpaste.it/5ksvg#
vahaduo : https://vahaduo.github.io/vahaduo/