What's new
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

Semitic(East mediterranean+southwest asia)

Tyaraya

Active member
I have more native North Western Asian 'Gedrosia' ancestry than 'Caucasus' ancestry. I am 100% native to North Western Asia.

A Jew or some other Semite from the south can never be more 'North Western Asian' by a default. It is ridiculous even to think about that!
What happened to you my Aryan friend? I see you went silent :LOL:
 

Guti

Active member
What happened to you my Aryan friend? I see you went silent :LOL:
Aryan Iron Age people from Iron Age Kurdistan/Upper Mespotamia (Lake Urmia) are by far much closer to the Aryan Kurds and even to other Western Iranics (like Talysh) than to the Semites. Eat your heart out.
 

Tyaraya

Active member
even though i am on your side ....dont talk nonsense please . we kurds are not from india or anything like that lol
I am not talking shit about you or even all Kurds. I am just refuting his bullshit.
Again like I said before I don't have anything against Kurds, I am talking about him being from India not all Kurds, so stay neutral.
 

Guti

Active member
I don't think Sri Lankan would accept you either, they are intelligent people. You have to try a bit harder.
Just a honest question. Why do you denounce your Semitic brothers such as Semitic Jews in Israel? Are you not happy for them they are doing great? If they were of my own race I would be proud of them, while you do even claim not being related to them. It is really crazy. We live in a crazy world. I don't even believe what I am reading.
 
Last edited:

Tyaraya

Active member
Just a honest question. Why do you denounce your Semitic brother such as Semitic Jews in Israel? Are you not happy for them they are doing great? If they were of my own race I would be proud of them, while you do even claim not being related to them. It is really crazy. We live in a crazy world. I don't even believe what I am reading.
Where have I denounced them? Stop lying and what makes you think that they want anything to have to do with us either?
I am glad though that you are proud to be South Asian.
 

Guti

Active member
Where have I denounced them? Stop lying and what makes think that they want anything to have to do with us either?
I am glad though that you are proud to be South Asian.
As far as I can remember It was you who were claiming to Assyrians are very different from other Semites.

And when you do acknowledge your kinship with the Semitic Jews you must search for the factors that connect you both with each other and furthermore what connects ‘Jews + Assyrians’ with your other Semitic brethren the Arabs.

When you look at this case, you will find out that it the Southern Levantine ancestry that connects all your racial brethren.

So, you origin has nothing to do with the Aryan Kurds or other native North Western Asian people.
 

Tyaraya

Active member
As far as I can remember It was you who were claiming to Assyrians are very different from other Semites.

And when you do acknowledge your kinship with the Semitic Jews you must search for the factors that connect you both with each other and furthermore what connects ‘Jews + Assyrians’ with your other Semitic brethren the Arabs.

When you look at this case, you will find out that it the Southern Levantine ancestry that connects all your racial brethren.

So, you origin has nothing to do with the Aryan Kurds or other native North Western Asian people.
Is that the best you can come up with? Try a bit harder.
 

Guti

Active member
I don't know, why don't you ask them instead of asking me?
Because you have more or less the same roots as the Jews. That's why I am asking. The place of origin of the ancient Jews should be similar to a place of origin of the ancient Arameans/Assyrians. Aramean was a language of Jesus who was an ethnic Jew.

I hope you can see how ridiculous and butt hurt you sound when you are trying to claim that Semitic Assyrians are very different from other Semites and that Semitic is just a language.


Semitic is NOT just a language, it is a RACE!
 

Tyaraya

Active member
Because you have more or less the same roots as the Jews. That's why I am asking. The place of origin of the ancient Jews should be similar to a place of origin of the ancient Arameans/Assyrians. Aramean was a language of Jesus who was an ethnic Jew.

I hope you can see how ridiculous and butt hurt you sound when you are trying to claim that Semitic Assyrians are very different from other Semites and that Semitic is just a language.


Semitic is NOT just a language, it is a RACE!
You mean just like Yezidi Aryans and Indian/Pakistani and other South Asian Aryans are one race?
 

Guti

Active member
You mean just like Yezidi Aryans and Indian/Pakistani and other South Asian Aryans are one race?
There are clearly many direct links between the ARYAN Ezdi Kurds and the Eastern Iranic people in South Central Asia.

We are not just linked by language.

It is mostly the Iran_ChL ancestry that links Aryan Ezdi Kurds with the Eastern Iranic people. Ancient Eastern Iranic people of South Central Asia (such as Scythians) were evolved from a proto-Eastern Iranic BMAC. And ancient BMAC (Aryan Iran_ChL) had direct ties with Kurdistan.

So, that means that Iranic people are not only linguistically linked, but also culturally and genetically linked to each other.


People of India and Pakistan are a different story. They are not Iranic, but mostly Indic/HINDU. They are just a mixture of people like Aryan Ezdi Kurds and Dravidians. But they are mostly Dravidian nowadays, though.
They don't speak a Western Iranic language. They speak a Hindu/Indic language that is closely related to Dravidian.


Kurds are Western Irani
Indians are Indic/HINDU, not even (Eastern) Iranic

So, very different from Kurds in the first place.
 
Last edited:

idklolimo

Well-known member
There are clearly many direct links between the ARYAN Ezdi Kurds and the Eastern Iranic people in South Central Asia.

We are not just linked by language.

It is mostly the Iran_ChL ancestry that links Aryan Ezdi Kurds with the Eastern Iranic people. Ancient Eastern Iranic people of South Central Asia (such as Scythians) were evolved from a proto-Eastern Iranic BMAC. And ancient BMAC (Aryan Iran_ChL) had direct ties with Kurdistan.

So, that means that Iranic people are not only linguistically linked, but also culturally and genetically linked to each other.


People of India and Pakistan are a different story. They are not Iranic, but mostly Indic/HINDU. They are just a mixture of people like Aryan Ezdi Kurds and Dravidians. But they are mostly Dravidian nowadays, though.
They don't speak a Western Iranic language. They speak an Hindu/Indic language that is closely related to Dravidian.


Kurds are Western Iranic
Indians are Indic/HINDU. not even (Eastern) Iranic.

So, very different from Kurds in the first place.
Which eastern Iranians are you talking about? People from Balochistan?
 

Guti

Active member
Which eastern Iranians are you talking about? People from Balochistan?
Ancient Scythians were Eastern Iranic and evolved from BMAC Horizon.

Pashtuns as Eastern Iranic people (they speak EASTERN Iranic) have their Eastern Iranic ancestry mostly from the Scythian/Saka groups


lo.jpg
 

Tyaraya

Active member
There are clearly many direct links between the ARYAN Ezdi Kurds and the Eastern Iranic people in South Central Asia.

We are not just linked by language.

It is mostly the Iran_ChL ancestry that links Aryan Ezdi Kurds with the Eastern Iranic people. Ancient Eastern Iranic people of South Central Asia (such as Scythians) were evolved from a proto-Eastern Iranic BMAC. And ancient BMAC (Aryan Iran_ChL) had direct ties with Kurdistan.

So, that means that Iranic people are not only linguistically linked, but also culturally and genetically linked to each other.


People of India and Pakistan are a different story. They are not Iranic, but mostly Indic/HINDU. They are just a mixture of people like Aryan Ezdi Kurds and Dravidians. But they are mostly Dravidian nowadays, though.
They don't speak a Western Iranic language. They speak a Hindu/Indic language that is closely related to Dravidian.


Kurds are Western Irani
Indians are Indic/HINDU, not even (Eastern) Iranic

So, very different from Kurds in the first place.
I clearly said Indian/Pakistani and other South Asians (Like Bangladeshis and others), I didn't mention anything about Eastern Iranic, did I?
Don't try to Weasel your way out.
 

Guti

Active member
Saka/Scythians as far as I know; Turkish
No, Turks could have absorbed some Eastern Iranic people in the Steppes, but they were Turks and didn't speak Iranic.

Btw, I am not 100% sure what language the MAJORITY of the Scythians spoke. They could have spoken different languages, since they were not really a homogeneous group.



They were like ancient DAESH/ISIS of the Steppes. Some DAESH spoke Arabic, some Turkic, some Hebrew, some Chechen, some an European language, like Albanian etc.
 
Top