off topic chat thread

[idklolimo]

nassbean is just a little lighter . they really do look alike imo

i don't know lol. I think they look quite different

 

[Basilisk]

Guyz who is more attractive


Vs

 

[idklolimo]

Guyz who is more attractive


Vs

View attachment 9870

second.

for some reason east asian women are not very attractive to me and i think siberian women look more attractive. this is just my objective opinion.

 

[Basilisk]

second.

for some reason east asian women are not very attractive to me and i think siberian women look more attractive. this is just my objective opinion.

So you are saying the first girl looks east asian to you?

 

[idklolimo]

So you are saying the first girl looks east asian to you?

Nope. She is looks like a southeast asian

 

[Basilisk]

Nope. She is looks like a southeast asian

Then why mention not being attracted to east asians??

Does the siberian woman look more east asian then the first girl?

 

[idklolimo]

Does the siberian woman look more east asian then the first girl?

not because she looks more east asian, but chinese women and southeast asian women in general don't attractive to me.

Then why mention not being attracted to east asians??

I see Siberian women differently from Chinese and Southeast Asian women. it's just a point of view

 

[Basilisk]

not because she looks more east asian, but chinese women and southeast asian women in general don't attractive to me.



I see Siberian women differently from Chinese and Southeast Asian women. it's just a point of view

I agrre siberian is different from chinese and seasian. According to some TA members, siberians are more east asian then chinese and seasians. Lmao

 

[Basilisk]

THe russian TA member said this Filipina-Southern chinese mix is too dravidian too pass for mongoloid

Then he claims, siberians like her are more mongoloid looking

 

[Ben Dover]

Target: Fuckerz_scaled
Distance: 4.0700% / 0.04070031
40.4 Old-European
26.4 Caucasian
22.8 Elamo-Dravidian
8.0 Afro-Asiatic
2.4 Indo-European

Target: Domiz_scaled
Distance: 3.6737% / 0.03673665
37.2 Old-European
34.2 Elamo-Dravidian
14.0 Indo-European
7.8 Afro-Asiatic
4.6 Caucasian
1.8 Japonic-Koreanic
0.4 Chukotko-Kamchatkan

 

[Kurdquistador]

Vocaroo | Online voice recorder

Vocaroo is a quick and easy way to share voice messages over the interwebs.

vocaroo.com

 

[Kurdquistador]

Vocaroo | Online voice recorder

Vocaroo is a quick and easy way to share voice messages over the interwebs.

voca.ro

 

[Maj313]

Dravidian is a linguistic group, why do motherfudgers keep referring to it as some genetic ancestry group ? 😂 by Dravidian do they mean Vedda? Cause the original Dravidian speakers were mainly Caucasoids like the Brahui before migration southwards being absorbed into the existing Vedda population. Saying some one has Dravidian in them is as dumb as saying someone has Celtic, Slavic or Cushitic in them. There’s no way Veddas existed in Southeast Asia but they have similar dark indigenous people such as the Negritos, Papuans and other Austronesian people - I guess some low IQ people are referring to these indigenous southeast Asians as “Dravidians”.

 

[Basilisk]

Dravidian is a linguistic group, why do motherfudgers keep referring to it as some genetic ancestry group ? 😂 by Dravidian do they mean Vedda? Cause the original Dravidian speakers were mainly Caucasoids like the Brahui before migration southwards being absorbed into the existing Vedda population. Saying some one has Dravidian in them is as dumb as saying someone has Celtic, Slavic or Cushitic in them. There’s no way Veddas existed in Southeast Asia but they have similar dark indigenous people such as the Negritos, Papuans and other Austronesian people - I guess some low IQ people are referring to these indigenous southeast Asians as “Dravidians”.

Lol the russian guy in TA(hugochaves) kept using dravidians as a reference point for australian aboriginals, then he claimed southern chinese and non-australoid seasians as dravidian

 

[idklolimo]

The word "Dravidian" can be used linguistically, phenotypically and genetically. Also, not forgetting that most people in the Indian subcontinent are heavily mixed with Veddoid/Dravidianoid/AASI.

 

[Maj313]

Brahvis from Pakistan who are classed as Dravidians, probably the biggest evidence of the Elamite-Dravidian theory

South Indian girl who won Miss USA, I believe she’s Telugu or Tamil

She has a little more Veddah ancestry obviously due where her ethnicity is located but there’s no way modern day South Indians are fully veddah, clearly modern day Dravidian speakers are not the best representatives of the Veddah “subrace”

Actual Vedda people today, somewhere in Sri lanka

Native Negrito people of Southeast Asia closely related to Papuans, they have nothing to do with Dravidian speakers of South Asia although they may share genetics with Vedda people but as you can see Southeast Asia has their own native black people, so constantly slandering Dravidian people is hilarious because they’re originally caucasoid group.

 

[Kurdquistador]

Brahvis from Pakistan who are classed as Dravidians, probably the biggest evidence of the Elamite-Dravidian theory

South Indian girl who won Miss USA, I believe she’s Telugu or Tamil

She has a little more Veddah ancestry obviously due where her ethnicity is located but there’s no way modern day South Indians are fully veddah, clearly modern day Dravidian speakers are not the best representatives of the Veddah “subrace”

Actual Vedda people today, somewhere in Sri lanka

Native Negrito people of Southeast Asia closely related to Papuans, they have nothing to do with Dravidian speakers of South Asia although they may share genetics with Vedda people but as you can see Southeast Asia has their own native black people, so constantly slandering Dravidian people is hilarious because they’re an original caucasoid group.

View attachment 9913

ok but when people use the term dravidian to describe someone they mean people like tamils etc.

you are right that brahuis are dravidians but many people online are probably not even aware of that

 

[idklolimo]

the world's most famous anthropologists associate the Dravidian phenotype with Veddoid and Indo Melanid. In addition, it goes without saying that phenotypes such as Gracile Indid and North Indid also have Veddoid admixture.

 

[Kurdquistador]

even balochs and brahui are on average minimum 10 - 12 % s-indian on harrappaworld . punjabis are 30 - 35

let alone other south asians

so yes natufian fucker is right that all south asian has this so called "dravidian" that is getting thrown around

 

[Maj313]

ok but when people use the term dravidian to describe someone they mean people like tamils etc.

you are right that brahuis are dravidians but many people online are probably not even aware of that

Yeah and it’s dumb although Brahvi are partly to blame for it as all of them also identify as Baloch and think people are dividing them if you insist on referring to them as Brahvi.

Also constantly conflating Dravidians with the Veda is also a disservice to both groups and it’s also used by Dravidian nationalists in India to push this narrative that they’re the actual natives of India when in reality they’re just as foreign as the Indo-Aryan speakers, it’s just that they absorbed more Vedda ancestry as they migrated earlier but also ended up wiping out the native Vedda language, culture and folk beliefs.