What's new
By:
Advanced search…
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

If you compared the average phenotype between these 2 crowds do they look the same or different

Maj313

Maj313

Well-known member
From a distance they look the same. Papuans are just the closest to the natives of Southeast Asia the way Andaman islanders are closest to the natives of South Asia before admixture, so all southeast Asians have some austronesian in them the way all south Asians have onge in the them, it’s just less visible the more mixed they are but you can still see it, the Filipinos still show a lot of austronesian/malayid traits, they just have less of it than the Papuan. Now according to one drop rule make of it what you will because if there are octaroons that identify as black/African origin despite looking mostly white.
 
B

Basilisk

Active member
Maj313 said:
From a distance they look the same. Papuans are just the closest to the natives of Southeast Asia the way Andaman islanders are closest to the natives of South Asia before admixture, so all southeast Asians have some austronesian in them the way all south Asians have onge in the them, it’s just less visible the more mixed they are but you can still see it, the Filipinos still show a lot of austronesian/malayid traits, they just have less of it than the Papuan. Now according to one drop rule make of it what you will because if there are octaroons that identify as black/African origin despite looking mostly white.
Click to expand...
Even from a distance they look different. In the second pic there are even some people who look completely east asian, that is impossible with the first pic.

Btw austronesian is not a ethnic/racial identifier, it's a linguistic one.
 
B

Basilisk

Active member
Maj313 said:
From a distance they look the same. Papuans are just the closest to the natives of Southeast Asia the way Andaman islanders are closest to the natives of South Asia before admixture, so all southeast Asians have some austronesian in them the way all south Asians have onge in the them, it’s just less visible the more mixed they are but you can still see it, the Filipinos still show a lot of austronesian/malayid traits, they just have less of it than the Papuan. Now according to one drop rule make of it what you will because if there are octaroons that identify as black/African origin despite looking mostly white.
Click to expand...
Btw papuans have 0% malayid as malayid is an southern mongoloid subgroup. Filipinos are 80 to 90% malayid in makeup, and like 20 to 10% sudsinid

To even claim they look similar is just preposterous.




Even with chinese admixture, they could never pass for SEAsian
Screenshot-20230503-170952-Samsung-Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:
Maj313

Maj313

Well-known member
while you’re right that austronesian is a linguistic group and not race but it’s basically linked to the negrito race indigenous to Southeast Asia sort of how the Dravidian linguistic group is linked to the Vedda subrace. All southeast Asians are mixed with negrito to vary extents, that’s why Filipinos/Indonesians/Malays/Thais don’t look like Japanese and Koreans
 
B

Basilisk

Active member
Maj313 said:
while you’re right that austronesian is a linguistic group and not race but it’s basically linked to the negrito race indigenous to Southeast Asia sort of how the Dravidian linguistic group is linked to the Vedda subrace. All southeast Asians are mixed with negrito to vary extents, that’s why Filipinos/Indonesians/Malays/Thais don’t look like Japanese and Koreans
Click to expand...
Wrong Austronesian is linked to Taiwanese Aboriginals who are not negrito. Below 5% negrito is trivial, nobody calls Spanish people as North African for their miniscule amount of moorish admixture. Filipinos, Malaysia, and Thais don't look japanese and korean because of the region they developed in, and because japanese and koreans have altaic ancestry , while Filipinos, thais, and Malaysian have southern China ancestry, not because we are drastically different races.
 
Last edited:
B

Basilisk

Active member
Nassbean said:
In the first picture they look darker which I suppose is due to papuan-like admixture
Click to expand...
The Timorese are a racially mixed people composed of Melanesian and Proto-Malay genetic elements. In addition, in common with other former Portuguese colonies where interracial marriage was common, there is also smaller population of people of mixed Timorese and Portuguese origin, known in Portuguese as Mestiço.
 
Turkic Warrior

Turkic Warrior

Well-known member
Basilisk said:
Wrong Austronesian is linked to Taiwanese Aboriginals who are not negrito. Below 5% negrito is trivial, nobody calls Spanish people as North African for their miniscule amount of moorish admixture. Filipinos, Malaysia, and Thais don't look japanese and korean because of the region they developed in, and because japanese and koreans have altaic ancestry , while Filipinos, thais, and Malaysian have southern China ancestry, not because we are drastically different races.
Click to expand...
Some southeast asians can look japanese,korean and even mongolian lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top