CHG at one point was widespread in western iran which is why iran-N is mostly derived from CHG or CHG like population. The only difference is that iran_N has some more exotic admixture that CHG didn't have.
There's a bit of a mix of Eastern Eurasia in CHG and a bit of South Asian in Iranian neo. that's why they take great distances from each other in g25CHG at one point was widespread in western iran which is why iran-N is mostly derived from CHG or CHG like population. The only difference is that iran_N has some more exotic admixture that CHG didn't have.
there is of course "onge" in pure Iran neo. but no one is pure iran neo. this may be why iran neo scores high on afro balochislike i said before i dont think iran n has such admixture even if the qpadm says 11% onge . i rather think that relative to CHG Iran N has some shift towards the jungle and sandnigger people lel
where does CHG originate / come from before ? dzudzuana right ?
That would make iran_N basically CHG with very minor to no differences. It's more logcial to conclude that Iran-N did have some of those sandnigger & Jungle people admix.like i said before i dont think iran n has such admixture even if the qpadm says 11% onge . i rather think that relative to CHG Iran N has some shift towards the jungle and sandnigger people lel
That's a separate issuethere is of course "onge" in pure Iran neo. but no one is pure iran neo. this may be why iran neo scores high on afro balochis
Iran_N on gedmatch on k12b if that's what you have in mind is mostly WCA and nothing else but that doesn't say muchby the way does nobody raise an eyebrow that Iran N scores very different from us on gedmatch ?
| Target: Talysh_Azerbaijan Distance: 2.9977% / 0.02997716 | |
|---|---|
| 32.6 | Mediterranean |
| 25.8 | Iran_Neolithic |
| 22.8 | Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer |
| 8.8 | East_European_HG |
| 8.8 | Natufian |
| 1.2 | East_Eurasian |
| Target: Kurdish Distance: 3.3257% / 0.03325675 | |
|---|---|
| 33.6 | Mediterranean |
| 28.4 | Iran_Neolithic |
| 18.8 | Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer |
| 10.2 | Natufian |
| 9.0 | East_European_HG |
| Target: Ezid Distance: 2.9881% / 0.02988150 | |
|---|---|
| 33.0 | Mediterranean |
| 27.4 | Iran_Neolithic |
| 16.8 | Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer |
| 11.2 | East_European_HG |
| 11.2 | Natufian |
| 0.4 | AASI |
| Target: Saudi Distance: 6.4986% / 0.06498554 | |
|---|---|
| 67.8 | Natufian |
| 15.2 | Iran_Neolithic |
| 14.4 | Mediterranean |
| 2.6 | Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer |
you aren't 'exotic' for syrian or lebanese standards. however i would agree that your looks don't coincide with your ancestral compositionlebanese and syrians get tons of natufian points but not as exotic as me lmao
these G25 Saudi references are taken from non-ssa admixed arabssaudi arabs have at most +6 ssa like exotic components from me by the way
Target: Levant_Natufian_Hunter-Gatherer_Levant_Natufian
Distance: 38.6931% / 0.38693137
47.6 Caucasoid:LUX_Loschbour
29.4 Negroid:Africa_Mesolithic_MWI_Hora_9000BP:I2966
23.0 Mongoloid:Northeastern_Asia_Neolithic_RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N:NEO238
Target: Lolll
Distance: 38.3767% / 0.38376708
50.0 Caucasoid:LUX_Loschbour
28.4 Mongoloid:Northeastern_Asia_Neolithic_RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N:NEO238
21.2 Negroid:Africa_Mesolithic_MWI_Hora_9000BP:I2966
0.4 Negroid:Africa_Mesolithic_CMR_Shum_Laka_8000BP:I10872