And who are the archaic primitive people? The Semites? Huns, last time I checked they had pretty powerful empires in West Asia - The Assyrians (ancient ones not the modern mongrels), Babylonians and the Akkadians were a world class empires and they had the first large cities. Don't forget the ancient Egyptians (not Semites, but Afro-Asiatic). Hate them all you like, but our schools were preoccupied with them more. They invented a lot of good shit in the ancient era. Persian empire followed, but the first advanced empires were the Semites. Sumerians, I'm not sure who they were linguistically although they would have merged with Babylonians and Akkadians (Semites).People must not be blinded by the colour or 'whitness' of the skin. It is a very recent phenomenon and depigmentation occurred after the Agricultural Revolution that took place on the Iranian Plateau and Upper Mesopotamia. ANE people predate Agricultural Revolution.
When you have ancient 'archaic' primitive people in mind don't try to compare them with the 'modern' evolved people or you will fail.
I think your negative idea of Semitic is based on Hitler's. But to Hitler, I'm sure not just Semites, but fucking Iranians, Anatolians, Caucasians and even Southern Europeans will be primitive looking dark haired, olive skinned, dark eyed monkeys. He only murdered Semites because his country was filled with them. And I say this a lot to anti-Semites (anti-Jews) who applaud Hitler for murdering Jews and shitting on Semites - They were fucking foreigners in his land. He would done the same if Germany was instead filled with fucking Sicilians or Georgians and whatnot. He wanted a Nordic Germany! And that's fucking that!