This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
As i´ve said, modelling an ghost population with modern samples is nonsense, and you should not trust 100% on amateur calculators unless you do it just for fun.
Rocinante had the best answers, unlike petalpusher who seems to had an agenda.
i dont know about the brazilian guy, but members like Rocinante and Zarass (a iberian member) had the same opinion as Nassbean, they even argued against petalpusher about this stuff.
Modelling Iberomaurusian non-eurasian part with modern samples is a grotesque error, since nobody have informations about an ancient ppl like ANA disregarding their facial features
Someone has posted a study from Bioxirv on TA saying the myth of "1/3 SSA Taforalt" has been debunked, but i dont remember the user, probably Nassbean.
I've seen a study wondering if the SSA in Taforalt being "real SSA" or some kind of ghost population (ANA), however I lost the link and TA has taken down.
when i find it, let's see if you still trust G25, and whats your purpose with this discussion?