Search results

i want permanent ban for Asil actually we will have to figure out what to do

@Admin as i have told you already this user is a troll and shitposter who has been given many chances and has been unbanned several times even though he didnt deserve to be unbanned . we unbanned him because we were hoping he will change but he didnt . since many months he is abusing the forum...

i banned you from the chatbox because you are a troll and a shitposter . and deleted that message because you are trying to flame a fight between members

oglum sen trollsun + shitposter yetti artik

wait until the admin comes until then be silent

yahu bi sus

konusmustuk bir hafta önce ....yeniden anlatmicam bani hakediyorsun . temelli ban verecegiz sana 100% . hazirlan

gelecek ikinize ban vericem admin dönerse

he is Kurdish and he is typical

no because what you mean applies to the northeast african component ☺️ ...what you just said i am saying for the northeast african component i am decently sure that red sea component is kebaran or proto kebaran . closest / best we can work with .

i know bro but i am trying to isolate. i am trying with logic to extract the "actual" kebaran or proto kebaran out of the natufian as component in gedmatch so far i have came to the conclusion that eurogenes k15 is good for it . K13 too but k15 might be better . the red sea component there =...

proto kebaran reconstructiion is probably something like 80% Red Sea + 20% Northeast African

since kebaran is proto natufian and the reconstruction is proto kebaran i would say the red sea is most likely = the reconstruction

Natufian Eurogenes K13 results Admix Results (sorted): # Population Percent 1 Red_Sea 38.37 2 East_Med 36.34 3 West_Med 19.79 4 Northeast_African 5.5 Single Population Sharing: # Population (source) Distance 1 Saudi 16.81 2 Yemenite_Jewish 21.66 3 Bedouin 22.15 4 Egyptian 23.39 5 Moroccan...

by the way i am was reading on several sites that the kebaran might be the closest thing to the hypo basal eurasian . this proto kebaran reconstruction might be the closest thing so far what we have that is basal eurasian

what i find very terrifiying is that there were no dentists

well ....pretty much everything is .....none of us lived back then lol

natufian has most likely developed into something less sandnigger than kebaran by genetic drift and my guess (i am usually right with things i say) is that if we would have to give this reconstruction a calculator component then it would be the Red Sea component in Eurogenes K13 so i think red...

but there is room and reason to speculate . we dont even know who the fuck these guys are imagine we would draw faces and put them online ....if we painted them decently people would just take them as legit reconstructions .....nobody is even questioning them .....wtf

there must be a difference though ? by the way i think these guys from ancestralwhispers make many of the reconstructions way darker than they were ..... i am suspecting to be able to guess those guys ethnic origins lel