Search results

"so much" ....1.6 lol but it is because of our curry haters . they injected you

the south asian component , the north european component

happy new year Mediterranean 9,17% Siberian 0,07% North_European 6,44% South_Asian 1,63% West_African 0,33% Caucasus 52,45% Gedrosia 13,81% Southwest_Asian 14,64% Northwest_African 1,45% Least-squares method. Using 1 populations...

yes later

the first one , the north indian guy . he got new replies : "Half white half Persian" "Deffo Iranian" "Kurdish, Persian, or maybe Indian" a guy said "Persian" and this indian dude quoted him saying "close ! indian" ....delusional dumbfuck its over . seriously . it is over

up

give me the coordinates of these gypsoid Kurds please

of course

yes but barcin has whg . it is EEF

lol .... paniya are not fully aasi . you can not label it as AASI then

you used paniya modern ?

why do the azeris score aasi . which aasi did you use

^ if it is barcin then it is EEF not ANF actually . if you used something like tepecik ciftlik you would score even more

this model is nonsense sorry

11.4 yemeni ? sure sure Target: fuckeeeeer_scaled Distance: 2.2457% / 0.02245682 34.8 Anatolia_BA 32.2 Iranic_BA 11.4 Arabia_Modern 10.6 Steppe_MLBA 8.0 Mesopotamia_BA 2.8 EastAsia 0.2 SSA

what is the arabia reference ? and what is the "iranic" one

neolithic - mesolithic area is king . because with those you have minimal components eating up each other n shit

nonsense lol

yes 180cm is perfect . also 183cm too if proportions are good in general in my experience this is how it is : 172.5cm = meh ....it is an okay height but a few cm below average 175cm = pretty good height . could be better of course but not bad at all 177.5cm = very good height . solid and not...