This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
yes of course
what i mean though is that even with 25 AASI he is not that exotic . so imagine if he didnt have it . Iran N is definitely not an exotic component for sure
yes and they dont even have in mind that modern baloch and brahui are 12 - 19 s-indian ranging while Iran N was max 7% with Iran LN that we NWA mostly have even only 2-3 %
and Ìran N also scores more Caucasus than modern baloch on top of it .
AND modern baloch inhabit the mars area where it...
one should not take it too serious yes . but as for now they are the closest reconstructions for Iran N IMO
and i am content that those balochs i have posted / chosen are good representatives
haha :D
i would say yes . maybe a little swarthier than Iran N but imo after Iranian HG / Hotu woman this bamut reconstruction is closest to Iran N
and i hope i am right because i find this bamut reconstruction really really cool . looks like a warrior
nonsense . that the neolithic mesolithic pops are distant to each other is EXACTLY one of the main reasons why it is better than bronze age , iron age
these idiots dont even realize that the bronze age pops are descended from neolithic / mesolithic people so actual heritage you want to see...