some of the Iran N representatives i posted in this thread together with the proto yamnaya reconstruction :
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
@Fuckerz
some of the Iran N representatives i posted in this thread together with the proto yamnaya reconstruction :
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
whatsup
which post man. there seem to be a dozen of themlol
check the post of mine that i quoted
which post man. there seem to be a dozen of them
www.anthroworldforum.com
you really think that this proto yamnaya reconstruction from chechnya made by ancestralwhispers is a good proxy to iran_n?some of the Iran N representatives i posted in this thread together with the proto yamnaya reconstruction :
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you really think that this proto yamnaya reconstruction from chechnya made by ancestralwhispers is a good proxy to iran_n?
doesnt that hotu reconstruction look a bit swarthier though? either way i cant help but to not take these ancestralwhisper reconstructions seriouslyi would say yes . maybe a little swarthier than Iran N but imo after Iranian HG / Hotu woman this bamut reconstruction is closest to Iran N
and i hope i am right because i find this bamut reconstruction really really cool . looks like a warrior
doesnt that hotu reconstruction look a bit swarthier though? either way i cant help but to not take these ancestralwhisper reconstructions seriously
dude looks like a motherfucker
everytime we see morons say that baloch are the best proxy for iran_n (even though they have curryoid baloch in mind ) we should show them these baloch instead. i am fed up with them claiming that iran_n was this pajeetoid hairy wogs who make baloch look exotic because they have the most iran_n derived ancestryone should not take it too serious yes . but as for now they are the closest reconstructions for Iran N IMO
and i am content that those balochs i have posted / chosen are good representatives
everytime we see morons say that baloch are the best proxy for iran_n (even though they have curryoid baloch in mind ) we should show them these baloch instead. i am fed up with them claiming that iran_n was this pajeetoid hairy wogs who make baloch look exotic because they have the most iran_n derived ancestry
no one gives a shit about all those factors that influence the way most baloch look (noncurryoid ones excluded) they are either dishonest and are trying to bend the truth or they never gave a thought to these factorsyes and they dont even have in mind that modern baloch and brahui are 12 - 19 s-indian ranging while Iran N was max 7% with Iran LN that we NWA mostly have even only 2-3 %
and Ìran N also scores more Caucasus than modern baloch on top of it .
AND modern baloch inhabit the mars area where it is fucking hot
natufian was less basal eurasian than chg and iran_n right? i wonder if this saudi person who scores 73% natufian will look less exotic than someone who scores a lot of chg and iran_n ( in case of iran_n, someone who is minimally aasi admixed or shows no aasi influence phenotypically)
i'll probably hit him up with a pm latercan you find out how he looks ?
...................................................