Search results

do you agree with him that you would pass as an outlier in greece? because i don;t see you being THAT atypical over there especially if we take mainland greece plus the islands into account

what a fucking bullshit. of course that rajput curry member was fixated on skin color in his/her comments. "What was South Asian parent skin color? If South Asian parent have light skin then they usually look west Asian or southern European If South Asian parent have dark skin then they look...

but my point is that most pajeets will not back down from passing people as south asain. the type of people who don't look south asian at all and that includes us and other west asians

is that right. go ahead and post your pics on r/phenotypessouthasia and see it for yourself. not to mention that already people sometimes tell you that you look indian or paki on facebook groups and in other spaces. which as you know i completely disagree with. and majority of those comments...

Exactly. They do it with you and they have done the same with me as well. "you look like pranja majmajut" even though there is no resemblance at all

That's fair enough. If you think about it the roots of the muh iranic or iran_n argument stem from balochis as well who speak an iranic language, have the lost amount of iran_n ancestry out of all the "iranics" and a lot of them frequently look pseudo-curryoid as well. Also, as far as I know...

The fact that they feel the need to force overlaps with afghans already says a lot because many afghans are curryoid themselves and punjabis seem them as white aryanz or whatever the fuck lel.. and of course them linking themselves to kurds is hilarious. As far as i am aware their primary...

that's too bad for our sintashta bros out there

pigmentation of aasi could be darker than that of this reconstruction's but as far as the facial features are concerned with a high degree of certainty i can say that aasi looked similar to the reconstruction

Modeling down below belongs to saudi. 15% SSA along with a lot of Natufian, very low CHG, and non-existent EEF. You don't have to go as far as to MENA to conclude that such groupings should not be used in the genetic context first and foremost but even the middle eastern labeling is trash and...

balochis are the new georgians Target: Balochi Distance: 10.0855% / 0.10085542 52.0 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer 15.2 AASI 13.8 Arabian_HG/Natufian 13.4 EHG 5.0 EEF_Balkan_N 0.6 SSA compared to CHG i have EEF and sand shift Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 5.1500% / 0.05150020...

dont care

i am not a geneticist obviously but such methodology is flawed imo. as a result the outputs also look baffling and ridiculous

even if it was basal eurasian it still would not have made sense

then it is nothing less than fucking ridiculousness that CHG and Iran_N have more SSA than Natufian and that Iran_N has as much/slightly less SSA than Taforalt and Neolithic Maghrebi

this apparently "The proportion of 'Mbuti' ancestry represents the total of 'Deep' ancestry from lineages that split prior to the split of Ust'Ishim, Tianyuan, and West Eurasians and can include both 'Basal Eurasian' and other (e.g., Sub-Saharan African) ancestry"

not according to reich or lazaridis or whoever made that modeling

Wouldn't be surprised if idiots saw that modeling and said: natufiam was less mbuti than chg and iran_n hence the latter two were more exotic and southern

but it was done by muh academics

Bullshit https://www.reddit.com/r/illustrativeDNA/s/jueI9hx4Wa