PART 1 :
i have seen some shitheads talk nonsense about Iran N again . claiming weird stuff .
so i will copy paste what i wrote about Iran N in other threads and dedicate a thread for Iran N only here
first of all lets list the ethnicities that have the highest Iran Neolithic ancestry / admix :
member onyx who ran qpAdm said that Iran N doesnt work for balochs when he run it but since G25 is used in forums often (qpAm is the academic tool and more accurate but ok) let us just base it on G25 :
1. Balochis and Brahuis
2. Iranian Bandaris
3. Iranian Mazandaranis
however .....Balochs/Brahuis and also Bandaris have south asian admix . and sometimes even SSA . so you have to be careful
but what does that mean ? it means that we have to look at the balochs and Bandaris who do NOT look south asian or SSA shifted
and it is meaningful to also look at Mazandaranis
i want to use Eurogenes K12b to analyze this and show you something
these are results of Iran N kit numbers :
notice that the Iran N scores almost no south asian . only a few percent . not more than 6 . but i ran baloch people through the calc and they get often 12 - 17 % . some even a little more if i remember right . wont check that right now but you have my word that many baloch score at least 12 %
so our task now is to find baloch people who score as close to the Iran N samples as possible . including as low south asian as possible
well i can show you 2 balochs who score similar to Iran N and have 8.5 and 9% south asian . which is still more than Iran N dont forget . so that means that actual Iran N were a little lighter and more "northern / western" looking than these 2 guys
but here they are
this Baloch guy :
and this Omani Baloch guy :
look at the differences to Iran N :
they get both less Caucasus than the Iran N kits
they have not that much south asian but still significantly more than the Iran N kits
the second guy has 7% southwest asian which the Iran N ktis dont have
what does that mean ? well that means that these 2 guys even though they are probably rather close to what Iran N looked like ....Iran N were less "exotic" and lighter etc. (more caucasus , almost no south asian compared to them , and less southwest asian) than them
either way it means that Iran N could NOT have been more exotic or darker than these 2 men ! we can safely say that . the results speak for themselves .
i have seen some shitheads talk nonsense about Iran N again . claiming weird stuff .
so i will copy paste what i wrote about Iran N in other threads and dedicate a thread for Iran N only here
first of all lets list the ethnicities that have the highest Iran Neolithic ancestry / admix :
member onyx who ran qpAdm said that Iran N doesnt work for balochs when he run it but since G25 is used in forums often (qpAm is the academic tool and more accurate but ok) let us just base it on G25 :
1. Balochis and Brahuis
2. Iranian Bandaris
3. Iranian Mazandaranis
however .....Balochs/Brahuis and also Bandaris have south asian admix . and sometimes even SSA . so you have to be careful
but what does that mean ? it means that we have to look at the balochs and Bandaris who do NOT look south asian or SSA shifted
and it is meaningful to also look at Mazandaranis
i want to use Eurogenes K12b to analyze this and show you something
these are results of Iran N kit numbers :
notice that the Iran N scores almost no south asian . only a few percent . not more than 6 . but i ran baloch people through the calc and they get often 12 - 17 % . some even a little more if i remember right . wont check that right now but you have my word that many baloch score at least 12 %
so our task now is to find baloch people who score as close to the Iran N samples as possible . including as low south asian as possible
well i can show you 2 balochs who score similar to Iran N and have 8.5 and 9% south asian . which is still more than Iran N dont forget . so that means that actual Iran N were a little lighter and more "northern / western" looking than these 2 guys
but here they are
this Baloch guy :
and this Omani Baloch guy :
look at the differences to Iran N :
they get both less Caucasus than the Iran N kits
they have not that much south asian but still significantly more than the Iran N kits
the second guy has 7% southwest asian which the Iran N ktis dont have
what does that mean ? well that means that these 2 guys even though they are probably rather close to what Iran N looked like ....Iran N were less "exotic" and lighter etc. (more caucasus , almost no south asian compared to them , and less southwest asian) than them
either way it means that Iran N could NOT have been more exotic or darker than these 2 men ! we can safely say that . the results speak for themselves .
Last edited:
