there is no point in going further like this with this logic we'll start considering anatolian ancestry as dzudzuana and natufian, iran_N as mostly dzudzuana+onge lolyamnaya samara is basically half CHG
but keep on ignoring me
there is no point in going further like this with this logic we'll start considering anatolian ancestry as dzudzuana and natufian, iran_N as mostly dzudzuana+onge lol
anyway europeans and georgians have two different ethnogenesis and even if you want to count the chg it would still be quite low for europeans
iran n = dzudzuana + ANE + MINOR ENA
it was just a matter of time until you will call iran n as onge. Iran N has very little ENA in it . it is mostly Dzudzuana + ANE . ....CHG is the same but with more Dzudzuana and almost none ENA
CHG is european . i linked you 2 sites where they explain that CHG is relevant for european ethnogenesis
but ok . lets agree to disagree
Onge constitutes a substantial portion of it
![]()
and your articles talk about CHG because of steppe people
www.anthroworldforum.com
www.anthroworldforum.com
why would you look different you don't have that much iran_N, people like balochi have around 60% in comparison but if I really wanted to troll you I could have mention basal eurasian ancestry lol
Yeah only the eurowogs that have recent, post Neolithic West Asian admixture would look like that
I would place a big bet on the European looking Georgians having high Steppe lol
they only have around 10-15% AASI...we have one of the highest iran n scores in west asia
balochs have AASI admix . without AASI they would look different
iran n is swarthy though no question .
they only have around 10-15% AASI...