i understood what you said i am not stupid
but you say that they have more ancient levantine ancestry than us ......which is ok i will not argue with that .....but then you say that those ancient levantines were MORE SOUTHERN than modern ones ....yet that doesnt make any sense because if that was the case then it would show in calculators and they wouldnt score only a little more southwest asian than us but they would score something like lets say 25% or something
if ashkenazi jews have more ancient levantine ancestry than us then those ancient levantines must have been more NORTHERN and not southern
Ancient southern levantines were no more northern than what modern day southern levantines. It is quite the opposite actually. I did explain why ancient southern levant was more southern. I guess you missed that part.
When you are saying thay they would score 25% SW asian it is nonsense because modern day northern levantines score 25% SW asian and they are still heavily SW asian ancestry wise. Why would ashkenazi jews who are only 1/2 ancient southern levantine score as much SW asian as 100% northern levantines?
If you take half yemenite jew and half dutch person for example they are going to cluster with ashkenazis because of their admixture. Yemenite jews are obviously more southern than even ancient southern levantines and dutch are obviously more northern than whatever european ancestry ashkenazis have in total but they balance each other, hence why this specimen clusters closest to ashkenazis