I think with Apricity, there is an obvious age difference between myself, a few others, and the rest of the people there. Most seem to be around 20 years old or so, so naturally they are filled with insecurities. Most of the time, there isn't a real debate going, just a few people throwing insults at each other in attempts to destroy their self-esteem and artificially make their arguments more sound in the process.
I agree with Anthroscape. A lot of South Asian trolls hid behind their computer screens.
Human Biodiversity was not that bad, but I can understand why people hated the moderator there. He was a pompous ass.
Honestly, I clocked out of any "phenotype" discussions long time ago because, at the end of the day, more than half the people arguing would have never guessed a person's ethnicity correctly unless stated in the title of the thread. Origuess App proved this during the Apricity thread.
I do think phenotypes should be restudied in academia, but I know it is much more nuanced than saying a person looks a certain way because of their origins and adapting to the climate. As much as I can't stand AI for certain things, I think AI can be great for studying phenotypes and why a group looks a certain way.