What's new
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

The October Crisis - Canada, 1970

SavannahCatGiannis

Active member
Country
Canada
Today is the 50th anniversary of the October Crisis.

I have to say there is a lot of creepy irony here, in the sense that exactly 50 years later, Canada is again under national lockdown, with the same emergency powers being invoked by a prime minister with the same name.

Anyway, thought I'd post some history. These events almost plunged Canada into civil war...

The October Crisis began 5 October 1970 with the kidnapping of James CROSS, the British trade commissioner in Montréal, by members of the Front de Libération du Québec (FLQ). It rapidly devolved into the most serious terrorist act carried out on Canadian soil after another official, Minister of Immigration and Minister of Labour Pierre Laporte, was kidnapped and killed. The crisis shook the career of recently elected Liberal Premier Robert Bourassa, who solicited federal help along with Montréal Mayor Jean Drapeau. This help would lead to the only invocation of the War Measures Act during peacetime in Canadian history.

Origins of the Crisis

Fed by nationalist discontent and rising unemployment, and by the example of colonial states rising against foreign imperialism, the FLQ emerged in 1963 to further the creation of an independent Québécois state. It vowed to use any means necessary, including violence, and carried out almost 200 crimes, including robberies and bombings, from its inception to its last days.

Armed members of FLQ cell Libération kidnapped James Cross at his home, while members of the Chénier cell took Laporte as he played with his nephew on his front lawn. The kidnappers' demands, communicated in a series of public messages, included the freeing of a number of convicted or detained FLQ members, a half-million dollar ransom and the broadcast of the FLQ manifesto. The manifesto, a diatribe against established authority, was read on Radio-Canada, and on 10 October the Québec minister of justice offered safe passage abroad to the kidnappers in return for the release of Cross. On the same day a second FLQ cell, Chénier, acting independently, kidnapped Pierre Laporte.

Invocation of the War Measures Act

The kidnapping raised a swift response from the federal government under Liberal leader Pierre Trudeau. As CBC reporter Tim Ralfe questioned the Prime Minister concerning the armed soldiers on Parliament Hill, Trudeau responded with a now-famous diatribe: "Well, there are a lot of bleeding hearts around who just don't like to see people with helmets and guns. All I can say is, go on and bleed. But it's more important to keep law and order in this society than to be worried about weak-kneed people who don't like the looks of..." Ralfe interrupted: "At any cost? How far would you go with that? How far would you extend that?" Trudeau replied with a sentence that became a catchphrase of North American politics: "Well, just watch me."


On 15 October the Québec government formally requested assistance from the Canadian Armed Forces to supplement the local police, and on 16 October the federal government proclaimed the existence of a state of "apprehended insurrection" under the War Measures Act. Under the emergency regulations, the FLQ was outlawed as membership became a criminal act, normal liberties were suspended, and arrests and detentions were authorized without charge. Over 450 persons were detained in Québec, most of whom were eventually released without the laying or hearing of charges.

Laporte Found Dead

On 17 October, the body of Pierre Laporte was found in the trunk of a car left near Saint-Hubert airport. In early December 1970, police discovered the cell holding James Cross. The force negotiated his release in return for safe conduct to Cuba for the kidnappers , the best known of whom were Marc Carbonneau and Jacques Lanctôt, and some of their family members. Almost four weeks later, the Chénier cell was located and its members arrested, subsequently to be tried and convicted for kidnapping and murder. Of these, Paul Rose and Francis Simard received the heaviest sentences: life in prison for the death of Laporte. Emergency regulations under the War Measures Act were replaced in November 1970 by similar regulations under the Public Order Temporary Measures Act, which lapsed on 30 April 1971.

War Measures Raise Ire of Civil Rights Activists

The federal response to the kidnapping was intensely controversial. According to opinion polls, an overwhelming majority of Canadians supported the Cabinet's action, but it was criticized as excessive by Québec nationalists and by civil libertarians throughout the country. Supporters of the response claim that the disappearance of terrorism in Québec is evidence of its success, but this disappearance might equally be attributed to public distaste for political terror and to the steady growth of the democratic separatist movement in the 1970s, which led to the election of a Parti Québécois government (1976).

Keable Commission

After the crisis, the federal Cabinet gave ambiguous instructions to the RCMP Security Service permitting dubious acts such as break-ins, thefts and electronic surveillance, all without warrants. All were later condemned as illegal by the federal Inquiry Into Certain Activities of the RCMP and the Keable Commission in Québec (Enquête sur des opérations policières en territoire Québécois). The federal minister of justice in 1970, John Turner, justified the use of War Measures as a means of reversing an "erosion of the public will" in Québec. According to some, Premier Robert Bourassa similarly conceded that the use of the War Measures Act was intended to rally popular support to the authorities rather than to confront an "apprehended insurrection."


Speech by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau invoking the War Measures Act (also invoked in March 2020, by Justin Trudeau, his son, to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic):


My mother was at a dinner theatre when it was bombed and she was arrested too, because they arrested EVERYBODY. Many people were arrested, without charge, when this was invoked.

Military on the streets:
LiberationCellSurrender.jpg

Octcrisi.jpg

octobercrisis.jpeg

121015023329-03-cuban-missile-1015-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg

image.jpeg

CrisisInset2.jpg

French%20Peeps.jpg

CrisisInset4.jpg

9374052.jpg

frontpic.jpg

Westmount.gif

Soldier-and-child-octcri.jpg


The October Crisis came out of long-simmering hostilities between English and French-speaking Canadians. But the happy ending is that these hostilities have toned down over time... but in the 1970s, they were pretty raw.

Just wondering... would you have done what he did in the same circumstances if you were running a country?
 
Last edited:

SavannahCatGiannis

Active member
Country
Canada
Wow, never knew this part of the Canadian history. Crazy event. I think that Pierre Trudeau used disproportional means to solve a situation like this.

These events are actually what lead in part to the negotiation and signing of the original NAFTA. Well, a mix of factors: English-French tensions in Canada and the instability of the Mexican Peso both presented significant national security risks to the USA, and the US government (I think it was Ronald Reagan but I am not 100% sure) felt opening up trade in North America would kill two birds with one stone, stabilizing the Peso and keep Canada together by bringing more jobs into both countries. Canada doesn’t have separatism problems, and the Mexican Peso is now reasonably strong, so I’d say it worked.

But yeah, Canadians did view what Trudeau did as excessive but he really had no other law on the books to use to stop it. So basically, he had to suspend the whole Canadian Bill of Rights. The law was changed after that, to make it less burdensome on the population, the only civil liberties you would lose are the ones necessary for the situation at hand (like when Justin Trudeau invoked such powers in March in response to COVID-19, only the right to free movement within Canada was suspended, and people employed in jobs that require free movement are exempted from this lockdown).

I think that the Canadians liked the way how Trudeau acted, because they re-elected him as the Prime Minister of Canada.

Well, “I prevented a civil war” tends to be a good talking point on the campaign trail. Well that and, although Pierre Trudeau’s economic record wasn’t the greatest (well, the global economy wasn’t that great back then), he did do many good things for the country.

One problem with Pierre Trudeau was he was too much of an ideologue, and I think this clouded his judgement on economic issues. Like, he was very Trump-like on economics, closing off Canada to trade and slapping tariffs on everything. He was also a leftist in a time when the global economic situation required a right turn as well (the US and UK made much more robust economic recoveries under Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, while Canada’s economy was still sluggish well into the 90s). Many Canadians respect him because he was strong in his ideology but I kind of like that Justin Trudeau is less of an ideologue than his father was and makes decisions based on science and data rather than ideology when going ahead with a policy (some Canadians don’t like this about Justin though). Though I kind of suspect that now he is happy that the science and data now points to more of a left turn to get Canada out of the COVID slump, because I think he does have leftist tendencies like his father.

The most interesting is that Pierre Trudeau himself had French roots.

Yeah but he was a Canadian nationalist. He was also a leftist, so he believed that solidarity between English and French (and everybody else) was possible. There are some militant angry French-Canadians who call him a traitor and a sellout, though. My own mother is one lol. There are also English-Canadians who don't like him because they think he placated French-speakers too much... and there was a backlash to offering services in French like French-language schools in English-majority areas were bombed and stuff.

Btw, I am glad that Québec has a separate status and that people of Québec are happy people nowadays.

Quebec actually still only has special status because they haven’t signed onto the constitution yet. Pierre Trudeau wrote the constitution (yeah we didn’t have one until him) and the last constitutional negotiations failed... this was back in 1995 and Quebec almost separated from Canada as a result (the vote was 49.9% Yes to 51.1% No... very close) so no politician is willing to crack open the constitution because of what happened the last time. So, we have a constitution that not everyone signed onto, and then Quebec has their own. I doubt we will ever get all provinces plus hundreds of First Nations to agree to the federal constitution. I would love to see it, but it’s kind of a third rail in Canadian politics these days.
 
Last edited:
Top