Anthro World Forum
This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
South Portugal - ancestry results vs 23andMe vs MyHeritage:
- Thread starter Luso
- Start date
Tungusic Hunter
Well-known member
Interesting
Chris Huiqui
Active member
23andMe looks like the most accurate in your case.
Luso
Member
- Country
-
Yes, 23andMe is the most accurate for iberians. Most Portuguese get anywhere from 97-100% Iberian now with the new update. But AncestryDNA is what I use for my raw data for g25 bc it's more accurate. I plot perfectly within the western Iberian cluster
post eurogenes k12b please
Luso
Member
- Country
-
it is the best calc in my opinion
Luso
Member
- Country
-
any reason why?
Luso
Member
- Country
-
good components and accurate results for populations
Jingle Bell The Baiano
Active member
Damn, despite the genepool of MH/Database is kinda bruh the genetis groups looks rly good, i get 1 from Portugal and other from Porto e Aveiro, idk if means anything recent, by looking at what ppl usually get prob it is
Last edited:
Luso
Member
- Country
-
Mine got my regions well… assuming the matches are based on relatives it would make sense. I also get a lot in Guarda, and aveiro as well
Eurafricanid
Member
- Country
-
Your 23andMe look the most accurate, but Ancestry is pretty good too! I think the biggest difference between them is that Ancestry overcompensates a bit for the British Isles and hides some of that North African DNA, interesting that you get 8% North African at MyHeritage, I thought they hid North African DNA, because I get 0% of that.
Luso
Member
- Country
-
My heritage doesn't hide the north African for iberians. You can look up "myheritage Portuguese" and see some examples