SavannahCatGiannis
Active member
The Canadian government is considering this.
Canada has public health care, so it’s not that people would be denied care, it’s just that if you show up at an anti-mask/anti-lockdown protest, and if hospitals get overwhelmed, you will be considered to have voluntary forfeited your access to public health care and will have to pay for hospital visits out of pocket.
nationalpost.com
Some issues there:
1. Against Canadian laws: Access to health care is actually in our constitution. So to deny a Canadian citizen health care, or charge them for access, is actually illegal. It would require enhanced government powers like Emergency Measures or the Notwithstanding Clause.
2. Against international human rights laws: The anti-lockdown/anti-mask movement is a far-right movement. As much as I hate the far-right, it’s against international law to kill or deny basic services like health care to somebody because of their political beliefs.
3. It’s unethical. Read the article.
Canada has public health care, so it’s not that people would be denied care, it’s just that if you show up at an anti-mask/anti-lockdown protest, and if hospitals get overwhelmed, you will be considered to have voluntary forfeited your access to public health care and will have to pay for hospital visits out of pocket.
Ethicists debate whether anti-mask protestors should forfeit COVID-19 medical care
'If you are a real believer in liberty, then you have to say, "I’ll pay the price" '
Some issues there:
1. Against Canadian laws: Access to health care is actually in our constitution. So to deny a Canadian citizen health care, or charge them for access, is actually illegal. It would require enhanced government powers like Emergency Measures or the Notwithstanding Clause.
2. Against international human rights laws: The anti-lockdown/anti-mask movement is a far-right movement. As much as I hate the far-right, it’s against international law to kill or deny basic services like health care to somebody because of their political beliefs.
3. It’s unethical. Read the article.
Last edited: