did i not say that craniometrically they would have been similar to CHGshe doesnt look exotic feature wise . she is just swarthy
but ok .
OK
did i not say that craniometrically they would have been similar to CHGshe doesnt look exotic feature wise . she is just swarthy
but ok .
OK
LooksFor example this is Iran mesolithic reconstruction and Iran mesolithic had more EHG shift than Iran_N. Iran_N would have been more exotic than Hotu
![]()
I am curious. How did the original dravidians/elamites look like? I know since they say that dravidians migrated to India from Iran.@ESARHADDON this one is for you
Target: Tamil_Sri_Lanka
Distance: 1.9457% / 0.01945665
53.2 Southern_Asia_10KYA
19.8 Western_Iran_10KYA
9.4 Mazandaran_Golestan_10KYA
4.4 Caucasus_10KYA
4.4 Northern_Iran_10KYA
4.4 Pontic_Caspian_Steppe(east)_10KYA
2.4 Mediterranean
1.4 North_Eurasia(ANE)_10KYA
0.6 Western_Siberia_10KYA
?Looks
I assume that Elamites would have looked similar to Iran_CHL or Bronze age Zagrosians. but i don't knowI am curious. How did the original dravidians/elamites look like? I know since they say that dravidians migrated to India from Iran.
Can u show an example of Iran Chl??
I assume that Elamites would have looked similar to Iran_CHL or Bronze age Zagrosians. but i don't know
I guess something similar to thisCan u show an example of Iran Chl?
Interesting. Because I’ve heard accounts of original Dravidians/elamites also being dark skinned. But I’m not sureI guess something similar to this
![]()
You should substitute kotias CHG woth Satsurblia CHG