I want to show people that Hindu Pashtuns are actually the Hindu/Vedic people and closely related to Hindu Punjabis and other Dravidian people in South (Central) Asia.
Punjabis from Pakistan and India are Vedic people. Pashtuns speak an Eastern Iranic dialect. But genetically they are almost the same. Pashtuns are very close to Hindu/Vedic people in India.
Like I said earlier, in Afghanistan only Tajiks and Uzbeks are not really Hindu/Vedic people.
Afghanistan is at least a tri-racial country with Mongoloid/Turkic Uzbeks, Iranic Tajiks and Hindu Pashtuns (and other Hindu/Vedic people) mixed with each other.
I still don't understand why those Hindu/Vedic people from South Central Asia are so much obsessed with the Kurds? We live in 2 very different separate worlds.
First of all, by that logic, most AFG tajiks themselves are supposedlly "hindus" or whatever, idk(including ones with lots turkic ancestry). Pashtuns like me, supposedly "more pure pashtuns" are closer to lots of east iranians(excluding ones with lots of turkmen/turkic/azerbayjani/kurdish ancestry, but even then im barely much closer to punjabis than to them), people not considered indians to you, than to most punjabis. Specially dravidians, who are further away from us than kurds, and yes, "pure" yazidis/kurds are.
Second, why are you so obessed with us? No one even mentioned pashtuns here.
This isnt even the first time youre doing that. You keep mentiong us being punjabis and whatnot.
Its like you WANT us to be only related to punjabis(you literally even said "i prefer to call them hindus")? I really dont understand why though?
