guti can you answer my question to you please
You're the one being a weasel by trying to make generalizing statements about Afghans having extra AASI because of BMAC but then turning around and saying that not all BMAC have AASI when someone points out that Kurds would have higher AASI ancestry due to having BMAC as well. BMAC and IVC were both highly cosmopolitan and had some individuals with almost no AASI and others with a lot of it. It's almost like all places in the world with civilization and urbanism have a diverse set of people, much like today.there are different kind of bmac you fucking troll . and you know that very well you sneaky weasel. some are heavily south asian . but we kurds dont have it . if we did then we would score aasi in the models like i posted where you give iran neo , barcin , levant neo , steppe , chg , aasi , east asian as references . but guess what ....we dont . as i showed you
That's crazy because tarkalani is one of the most South Asian shifted Pashtun groups and they're not even FROM Afghanistan. Iranian Neolithic has been modeled with AASI much higher than just 6% before, even CHG has been modeled with some. Paleolithic Europeans like Gravettians get 15-28% ASI in GEDmatch as well. Use kit number T947885 on HarappaWorld and MLDPnope . i used tarkalani because member ImHere who is afghan told me to use it instead of the pashtun sample which is more south asian shifted . so i actually did you a favor and used tarkalani because ImHere said it is more accurate as a pashtun reference . so i did it for fairnes sake . you piece of shit you
Those are not all the Pashtun groups, and NONE of those are AFGHAN Pashtuns. Yusufzai are mostly from Pakistan, so are most Uthamnkhels. Use Kandaharis, North Afghan Pashtuns, etc. You are so hell bent on proving that it is that they are too AASI shifted for Kurds and ignoring that its the fact that Kurds are too steppe deprived and have too much East MEd and Southwest Asian/Arabian admixture. You complain about people spreading ignorance about your ethnicity, but you can't even recognize which tribes of Pashtuns come from Afghanistan vs Pakistan and you choose to spread even more blatant ignorance about other groups.ok i will run all the pashtun references . here you go :
Target: Uthmankhel
Distance: 1.9762% / 0.01976164
35.6 Steppe_EN
31.0 Iran_N
17.8 AASI
14.0 Anatolian_Farmers_N
1.6 EastAsian_HG
---
Target: Pashtun
Distance: 1.8724% / 0.01872378
33.8 Steppe_EN
31.0 Iran_N
19.6 AASI
13.4 Anatolian_Farmers_N
2.2 EastAsian_HG
Target: Yusufzai
Distance: 1.8832% / 0.01883156
34.2 Steppe_EN
31.8 Iran_N
19.6 AASI
13.4 Anatolian_Farmers_N
1.0 EastAsian_HG
^ lmfao
No, it's not. Clearly you didn't read the descriptions of these tools when you used them.distance of 11 ? huh ? are you halucinating ? where do you see a distance of 11 . which model ?
a fit of 3 is good enough . especially when you use all relevant populations then a fit of 3 is good . i used every relevant pop . iran n , barcin , levant , steppe , east asian . it doesnt get better
I'm not myanthropologies you idiot. myanthropologies hasn't been on a single anthroboard in nearly 3 years.you are myanthropologies . it is so obvious . and you claimed to be fully afghan on TA . wtf ?
Yes, and the steppe is a MUCH larger reason they don't cluster with Kurds. If I remove their NE European DNA and add it to East Med, they get significantly closer to Kurds, even closer than the Lebanese, and that's with keeping their South Asian the exact SAME. Look for yourself here:and you fucking idiot i posted a model that shows the aasi of pashtuns and also the steppe too . yes afghans also have more steppe than us



Look above. I showed you three times, including in my original post but you chose to ignore, just like you chose to ignore the fact that him and the other anthroboard Afghans are genetically closer to North Caucasian anthroboard members than you are:Then separate the Levant Neolithic from your "European Farmer" DNA as well, because that's "NOT the same . it just isnt."
show me what you mean with owight gavnah etc. . i dont understand what you are refering to


My wife is Sicilian. I see Sicilians literally every day, and her family members all look whiter and more European than all of the Kurds you posted. Kurds look much closer to both Persians and Afghans, and literally anyone who isn't stupid can see that. IBD analysis and formal academic tools show them to be genetically closer to each other and share more recent ancestry with each other as well. Have you ever looked in a goddamn mirror yourself? You're brown as FUCK, and you're considered dark for Afghan standards as well. Go live in a Taliban-ruled village for a year and not in your parents' basement in Germany, and you will be even browner.you are so pathetic . honestly . the women are all normal kurdish looking . dyed hair , contact lenses . hahahaha .
they dont have that and those few who do do it like women in any ethnicity . they are neither picked on purpose for that by me nor do the women look non kurdish in any way
sorry but my gallery is extremely representative of kurdsi know it hurts you but it is how it is
but if you continue like this you will get banned very quickly . so be careful of what you are saying . because my gallery has no flaws . and it took me so much effort to make the gallery and i posted literally a billion kurds . it is extremely rude and trollish to accuse me of cherrypicking or anything of that sort . so stfu
nope
many of the men look more different from us than my sooo loved south / southeast yuropeenz who you actually see as superior but project it on me as if i do only because i say the obvious that your people look more different to us often than they do
but anyway .....if you want to believe it then you can . it wont change the reality though
haha i was waiting for thisi am darker than many afghans ?
loooooool . ok .....if you want to think that xD
there is nothing wrong with being dark anyway . but saying i am darker than afghans is just ridiculous![]()
![]()
![]()
i know that there are even blonde blue eyed afghans btw. . i know that there is diversity of course . however i am in no fucking way darker than many afghans . my pigmentation is very typical for northern west asia and coastal south europe .
and i dont want to make comparisons with sicilians . this is objective anyway . and many kurds look med . med is not exclusive to europeans
but bottom line is that MANY pashtuns and tajiks look very different than kurds . this is a fact and it is obvious to see
btw.
dark
![]()
![]()
outside with good lightning :
![]()
You're the one being a weasel by trying to make generalizing statements about Afghans having extra AASI because of BMAC but then turning around and saying that not all BMAC have AASI when someone points out that Kurds would have higher AASI ancestry due to having BMAC as well. BMAC and IVC were both highly cosmopolitan and had some individuals with almost no AASI and others with a lot of it. It's almost like all places in the world with civilization and urbanism have a diverse set of people, much like today.
That's crazy because tarkalani is one of the most South Asian shifted Pashtun groups and they're not even FROM Afghanistan. Iranian Neolithic has been modeled with AASI much higher than just 6% before, even CHG has been modeled with some. Paleolithic Europeans like Gravettians get 15-28% ASI in GEDmatch as well. Use kit number
Those are not all the Pashtun groups, and NONE of those are AFGHAN Pashtuns. Yusufzai are mostly from Pakistan, so are most Uthamnkhels. Use Kandaharis, North Afghan Pashtuns, etc. You are so hell bent on proving that it is that they are too AASI shifted for Kurds and ignoring that its the fact that Kurds are too steppe deprived and have too much East MEd and Southwest Asian/Arabian admixture. You complain about people spreading ignorance about your ethnicity, but you can't even recognize which tribes of Pashtuns come from Afghanistan vs Pakistan and you choose to spread even more blatant ignorance about other groups.
No, it's not. Clearly you didn't read the descriptions of these tools when you used them.
I'm not myanthropologies you idiot. myanthropologies hasn't been on a single anthroboard in nearly 3 years.
Yes, and the steppe is a MUCH larger reason they don't cluster with Kurds. If I remove their NE European DNA and add it to East Med, they get significantly closer to Kurds, even closer than the Lebanese, and that's with keeping their South Asian the exact SAME. Look for yourself here:
with nothing altered (owight_gavnah):
View attachment 2078
with his NE-European DNA completely removed and exchanged for increased East Med DNA and everything else the same, he clusters closer to you than Lebanese and Palestinians do, even with his South Asian DNA level left untouched:
View attachment 2074
With his S. Asian DNA removed and replaced with extra West Asian, he clusters even FURTHER from you than he does without altering his components:
View attachment 2079
Look above. I showed you three times, including in my original post but you chose to ignore, just like you chose to ignore the fact that him and the other anthroboard Afghans are genetically closer to North Caucasian anthroboard members than you are:
Hnery007(pashtun), Owight_gavnah(afghan), myanthropologies(Pashtun) all genetically closer to Dismal_Knight(Avar) than you are:
View attachment 2076
You are about equally as close to Chechens as Afghans are:
View attachment 2077
My wife is Sicilian. I see Sicilians literally every day, and her family members all look whiter and more European than all of the Kurds you posted. Kurds look much closer to both Persians and Afghans, and literally anyone who isn't stupid can see that. IBD analysis and formal academic tools show them to be genetically closer to each other and share more recent ancestry with each other as well. Have you ever looked in a goddamn mirror yourself? You're brown as FUCK, and you're considered dark for Afghan standards as well. Go live in a Taliban-ruled village for a year and not in your parents' basement in Germany, and you will be even browner.
Man, I really don't care. You posted on a white supremacist Italian forum full of some of the most disgusting and racist people on the entire planet, and you are okay with it because they validated your views about Kurds. Then on top of that, you're allowing racist people to post on here and saying things like "Punjabis are next level curry DNA." You have 0 shame and 0 self-respect.
"That's crazy because tarkalani is one of the most South Asian shifted Pashtun groups and they're not even FROM Afghanistan. Iranian Neolithic has been modeled with AASI much higher than just 6% before, even CHG has been modeled with some. Paleolithic Europeans like Gravettians get 15-28% ASI in GEDmatch as well. Use kit number"
Dude, to be fair, there are lots of eastern afghans scoring similiar to tarkalanis and uthmankhels. Afghans from around Nangarhar, Laghman, Parwan, Kunar, Kabul can be as south asian as these pashtuns, despite the latter not being from AFG. There are eastern afghans more south asian shifted than KPK'wals (though theyre rather alike more south asian shifted KPK'wals).
"You're the one being a weasel by trying to make generalizing statements about Afghans having extra AASI because of BMAC"
Afghans just simply are more south asian shifted, because we live far more east and stayed there, recieving additional IVC admix unlike kurds who gets very little to none.
" Have you ever looked in a goddamn mirror yourself? You're brown as FUCK, and you're considered dark for Afghan standards as well."
How is he brown asf? He's rather on par with many afghans, with many others being darker than him. The ones lighter than him are pale asf anyways, as white as snow. He isnt dark for afghan standards at all.
Honestly man, you gotta tone down on with the claims/insults.
www.anthroworldforum.com
Yes you are.and i am not dark . especially not for afghanistan
if i am dark then afghans are black
The Kafirs of the Kati tribe, who live in the easternmost section of Kafiristan, are taller and larger-headed than the Pathans, but still essentially dolichocephalic and leptorrhine.26 They seem also to possess a high ratio of blondism. Like the Pathans, their commonest skin color is a medium brunet white, von Luschan #9, but in hair and eye color they seem to be lighter than the Pushtu-speaking peoples. Thirty-four per cent have mixed or light eyes, as opposed to 20 per cent of Pushtus. Their hair color, according to Stein, is blond or light brown in 28 per cent of the group.27
dude you got to be kidding me . honestlyYes you are.
You're an idiot if you think that
dark :
![]()
LMFAO
You fail the paper bag test bro
i would look like a papuan next to these afghans
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i actually think i am as dark as seal or p diddy
i would be extremely brown among afghans
![]()