What's new
By:
Advanced search…
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

how Iran Neolithic and CHG most likely looked like

Kurdquistador

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
Ben Dover said:
if you have this guys harappawolrd results then we could compare how expressive and dominant s-indian/AASI is compared to mongoloid components over there
Click to expand...

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 NE-Euro 41.08
2 Mediterranean 23.77
3 Caucasian 22.59
4 Baloch 6.79
5 SW-Asian 4.08
6 NE-Asian 1.5
7 W-African 0.11
8 San 0.05
9 Siberian 0.02

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 romanian-a (behar) 5.61
2 bulgarian (yunusbayev) 7.54
3 hungarian (behar) 10.23
4 slovenian (xing) 11.5
5 italian (hgdp) 16.81
6 french (hgdp) 16.85
7 tuscan (hgdp) 18.58
8 tuscan (hapmap) 18.64
9 tuscan (1000genomes) 18.73
10 n-european (xing) 19.09
11 ukranian (yunusbayev) 19.34
12 utahn-white (1000genomes) 20.08
13 utahn-white (hapmap) 20.46
14 british (1000genomes) 22
15 spaniard (behar) 23.33
16 ashkenazi (harappa) 23.9
17 orcadian (hgdp) 24.23
18 spaniard (1000genomes) 24.58
19 mordovian (yunusbayev) 25.1
20 russian (behar) 25.2

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 57.9% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 42.1% hungarian (behar) @ 1.65
2 65.4% romanian-a (behar) + 34.6% hungarian (behar) @ 1.77
3 68.2% romanian-a (behar) + 31.8% slovenian (xing) @ 1.84
4 72.3% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 27.7% n-european (xing) @ 1.97
5 73.7% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 26.3% utahn-white (hapmap) @ 2.05
6 61% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 39% slovenian (xing) @ 2.07
7 86.6% romanian-a (behar) + 13.4% lithuanian (behar) @ 2.28
8 77.1% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 22.9% orcadian (hgdp) @ 2.31
9 80.8% hungarian (behar) + 19.2% cypriot (behar) @ 2.37
10 78.9% romanian-a (behar) + 21.1% n-european (xing) @ 2.4
11 83.3% romanian-a (behar) + 16.7% belorussian (behar) @ 2.44
12 79.2% romanian-a (behar) + 20.8% ukranian (yunusbayev) @ 2.45
13 73.7% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 26.3% utahn-white (1000genomes) @ 2.48
14 80.2% romanian-a (behar) + 19.8% utahn-white (hapmap) @ 2.49
15 50.8% tuscan (1000genomes) + 49.2% ukranian (yunusbayev) @ 2.58
16 57.7% tuscan (hgdp) + 42.3% russian (behar) @ 2.62
17 75.6% bulgarian (yunusbayev) + 24.4% british (1000genomes) @ 2.62
18 57.5% tuscan (1000genomes) + 42.5% russian (behar) @ 2.68
19 83.2% romanian-a (behar) + 16.8% orcadian (hgdp) @ 2.77
20 57.6% tuscan (1000genomes) + 42.4% belorussian (behar) @ 2.8
 
Kurdquistador

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
by the way this is his MDLP K10 ancient roots results . one of the few calcs that shows his east eurasian


ENF 22.00
MHG 14.03
OOA-Basal 29.58
East-Eurasian 6.83
Amerindian 1.50
Archaic-Man 0.26
Human_root 1.49
Oceanian 0.80
ASA 1.35
ANE 22.16
 
Kurdquistador

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
Iran N

47402740bf.jpg
 
Kurdquistador

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
i will post Harappaworld results of Iran N , Iran Late Neolithic , and the Baloch average score from the spreadsheet :

note that the kit numbers unfortunately dont work anymore since they have become private :(



Kit M967114 (Iran Neolithic):

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baloch 62.71
2 Caucasian 24.97
3 S-Indian 6.13
4 SW-Asian 3.88
5 W-African 1.78
6 Papuan 0.35
7 San 0.18



Kit M937770 (Iran Late Neolithic):

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baloch 56.25
2 Caucasian 32.91
3 SW-Asian 8
4 S-Indian 2.64
5 Pygmy 0.21



Balochi Spreadsheet :

Baloch : 54.09

Caucasian : 13.64

s-indian : 13.54

SW-Asian : 8.88

NE-Euro : 3.03

mediterranean : 1.81


look at this .....the Iran N kits have way more "caucasian" , waaay less s-indian . the baloch average has 13.54 while Iran N has 6 and Iran LN only 2.64

therefore our analysis is correct that it is the lighter and non curry face modern Baloch who can be somewhat be taken as a proxy for Iran N and NOT the dark and south asian looking ones

because herp derp ...more caucasus and less s-indian makes you whiter you dumbfucks

-
-
-
 
Kurdquistador

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
idklolimo said:
Do Indians who see this facial reconstruction think that this man looks North Indian or Pakistani?
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...


on twitter where this reconstruction was posted someone posted an old indian man and said he is CHG type . the guy posting it is most likely pajeet

needless to say the indian man didnt look CHG anyway . pajeets are the most delusional people there is
 
Last edited:
idklolimo

idklolimo

Well-known member
Le-Fuckeur said:
on twitter where this reconstruction was posted someone posted an old indian man and said he is CHG type . the guy posting it is most likely pajeet

needless to say the indian man didnt look CHG anyway . pajeets are the most delusional people there is
Click to expand...

LOL

knjjk.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top