they are mostly AASI as you can see in the modeling abovebut paniya apperently were also hoabinhian . therefore it is better to use other people as AASI
they are mostly AASI as you can see in the modeling above
Are you joking or what. Who cares what curries accept or deny. They won't ever accept that Iran_N did not look like them so why should they be taken seriously. Paniya are only 5 and 7% at most Onge like and 70% AASI so it doesn't matter anyway. And you also have people like pulliyar who almost have as much AASI as Paniya so you can use them as examples as wellyes but i often read how people (i think mostly south asians) say that paniya are not a good reference for AASI since they have hoabinhian ancestry (probably on qpAdm ? dunno)
what i mean is that we should use other peoples because otherwise the south asian gang will just not accept it
no. they are the arabs whose modeling i posted with 78% natufian^
they are probably mixed with ssa though no ?
dodecad k10a is trash for ancient components
from 5-6% to 39% jump in red sea does not result in significant phenotypical changes. mind you we score 5-6% red sea
not at allare you crazy ......wtf
it is an IMMENSE difference
not at all
proxies to AASI
![]()