This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
I have posted a few in other threads but I am too lazy to repost them now. Maybe later. But I think the contrary actually. I think that CHG was slightly whiter than ANF and it is a well known fact that individual who was found in Satsurblia had gene mutation for blue eyes and light skin with black hair and brown eyes. Some other CHG individuals could have also had light hair, light skin and light eyes all together but I have never thought of CHGs as sandniggers, wtf lol
Wtf are you talking about. If CHG was sandnigger than you are negrito, no offence bro
I believe Zehri are Brahui, they’re located in southeast Balochistan near Sindh, I’m not sure if that’s part of Makran - they’re considered a part of Jhalawan confederacy.another Iran N example IMO
@Maj313
bro what was this man exactly ? he is from pakistan his name wasTariq Zheri
he was in a makran division or something it says . was he a makran baloch ?
Do my examples match your expectation?
Yes, somewhat
Allahu Akbar.
lol
Natufian did not have the same skin tone as CHG
look at this. https://genetiker.wordpress.com/pigmentation/
Do you think that the information about Natufian in this table is wrong and the information about other examples is correct?
I am not so certain about Gravettians and WHG having dark/very dark skin tone, but most anthropologists seem to agree on them having dark skin color, so maybe that's how it is. Other than that, from what I looked at, the table is not so bad, but one Jordan EBA sample cought my eye, as in the table they mention that the sample had red hair and blue eyes
