by the way guti could be closer to georgians on eurogenes k13 . because a lot of the "gedrosia" goes into the "west asian" component
Anthro World Forum
This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
Classify him and where does he pass?
- Thread starter Ben Dover
- Start date
- Country
-
The Only way to know that is to compare your Eurogenes k13 results to his.
guti what is your distance to georgian and / or abkhasian on eurgoenes k13 ?
- Country
-
According to the general knowledge, the first known and identified traces of civilization hail from Sumerians. Were they from Zagros?
- Country
-
The armenian admixture in assyrians is overexaggerated. If anything, the mixing between assyrians and armenians take place in modern times.
on eurogenes k13 you are closer as k predicted
we dont have much natufian to begin with . our natufian score is around 7 % or so
even armenians have more
even armenians have more
- Country
-
Asiatic Alpine & Syrid
Lebanese
Lebanese
- Country
-
he is Georgian actually
By predominant I mean a lot. 50% is a lot of fucking input. And yes I know what Semitic means. It's both a language family and as well as a race. Some West Asians look more Semitic and others look more Iranic. It's a spectrum. Oh and others have Med in them....And what do you mean by Assyrians are NW Asians? Lmfao, Northwest Asians are fucking Russians in fucking Siberia and places around there! That's northwest Asia for ya. Learn some geography, cutie pie.
Yeah it's pretty odd Lmao. I mean, I can't stand some Greeks and Turks here in Detroit, but I don't mind being confused as one and I probably would have distant Greek and Turkish ancestry. Who gives a fuck really? I'm also not so fond of the Dutch but I don't mind my small Dutch makeup at all!
I do agree with him that there is a Semitic look to be fucking fair. Just as there is an Indic, Iranic and Turkic look. But not all fucking Semites and other groups look like their "race". As I said, many lie in the spectrum.
- Country
-
That is not how it works. Northern west asia is not northern eurasia. You are confusing the two. Semitic is not a race! You sound like a romanian dude on TA who uses semitic a lot to describes somebody's looks and race. He is totally wrong btw.By predominant I mean a lot. 50% is a lot of fucking input. And yes I know what Semitic means. It's both a language family and as well as a race. Some West Asians look more Semitic and others look more Iranic. It's a spectrum. Oh and others have Med in them....And what do you mean by Assyrians are NW Asians? Lmfao, Northwest Asians are fucking Russians in fucking Siberia and places around there! That's northwest Asia for ya. Learn some geography, cutie pie.
Last edited:
By predominant I mean a lot. 50% is a lot of fucking input. And yes I know what Semitic means. It's both a language family and as well as a race. Some West Asians look more Semitic and others look more Iranic. It's a spectrum. Oh and others have Med in them....And what do you mean by Assyrians are NW Asians? Lmfao, Northwest Asians are fucking Russians in fucking Siberia and places around there! That's northwest Asia for ya. Learn some geography, cutie pie.
there is no "iranic look"
- Country
-
Damn. People say some stupid crap sometimes. Out of curiosity I created a similar thread to this one about my pheno and where I pass in eupedia and I have heard some of the dumbest responses ever
- Country
-
which one
Flik
Active member
Man in the OP.
- Country
-
i meant which jewish group not the dude himself
Flik
Active member
Maybe MIddleEastern shifted Ashkenazi or Caucasus jew