This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
it is rather that both Iran N and CHG descend from baradostians ...around mesopotamia
CHG got shifted towards EHG and Iran N probably mixed a little with a ghost central asian pop
you wont get a good distance . but you can see some shifting
distance of CHG to Iran N is around 18.5 . when you use Shetlandic + Iran N the distance is 15.4
when i used individuals of Iran N and Shetlandics i brought it down to 14.4 or so
^ hi
how is it not true ?
i think it is not 50 50 but 55 natufian 40 barcin n and 5 Iran N iirc . something like that
it is true that Levant N IS a mix of Barcin N like stuff + Natufian
no thats not the reason (only) . they think that they can hurt me with classifying me as Armenoid because Armenoid is considered to be one of the ugliest phenotypes by many . so of course the haters will classify me as such
i dont even know why i have haters . i never NEVER STARTED shit with...
when i first joined forums and made threads about me people classified me as Med + Armenoid , Med + Alpine , Armenoid too but not that often , Dinaric sometimes
after being in forums the people who dont like me usually classified me as fully Armenoid
some also attacked me like "LOL you are...
by the way just wanted to add this :
i didnt post all the thousands and thousands of Kurds only to prove that we dont look south asian or gypsy or whatever people had wrongly in mind . like i was not explicitly picking (or cherrypicking) Kurds to disprove them . no
i am posting Kurds the way...