Search results

Sup bro

@Sucuklu Ceviz Hunter Gatherer

What exactly triggered that post. Maj did not insult you did he

I wonder if the coordinates are just mislabeled and they belong to a Cappadocian Greek/Central Anatolian Greek. otherwise this makes no sense

What The Fuck.. 21% CHG Target: Greek_Lycaonia_Ikonio Distance: 3.2804% / 0.03280397 50.2 TUR_Marmara_Mentese_N 21.6 Caucasus_Hunter-Gatherer 13.6 Iranian-Farmer 10.0 Levant_Natufian 4.6 European-Hunter-Gatherer-EHG

What do you mean you sucuklu ceviz bro

I probably resemble Levant_N/Levantine Farmers the most

What the fuck are these pictures. Especially the ones in which they are chained to the neck

Ok bro. Thanks for telling him

Bro

The thing is that Iran_N proceeds Iran mesolithic and had a split from basal eurasian further back in time.. and if anything Iran_N should have been modeled with CHG or Hotu or a relevant source as they both preceded Iran_N. But fuck this shit nigga

Why did you quote me

But ANF modeling does not make sense to me. It being 1/3 Levant_N 1/3 Iran_N and 1/3 WHG

Would be good to see natufian modeling as well perhaps with dzudzuana, although it will most likely come out as 89% dzudzuana or barcin + 11 % mota

Personally I would like to see how Iran_N gets modeled on qpAdm but without using basal eurasian

WSHG was 75% similar to EHG the rest being mongoloid shifted and it was 80% similar to ANE

CHG has Med and EHG shift compared to Iran_N. How is Barcin 1/3 WHG, 1/3 Levant_N and 1/4/3 Iran_N. Wtf

That might work for you because whatever CHG you get is going to absorb excess EHG and by removing that you'll get even more EHG, not sure about WHG though. And removing ANF in favor of Levant_N is braindead because levant_N basically consists of Mediterranean+ Natufian in a rough 50/50 split...

Can you also invite him here