Unrelated but why indic,nuristani and iranic languages are put in the same ``indo-iranian`` sack ?
well in a bigger scope all indoeuropean languages are under the "indoeuropean" sack . which is idiotic if you ask me . but i dont know why indid + nuristani + iranic are put into the indoiranian language sack . but i can tell you that this has nothing to do with race / ethnicity .
we are not even like many other iranic speakers like balochs and pashtuns for example . even many persians are different from us ethnically and lookwise .
the only other iranics who are actually similar to us are people like talysh , gilakis , lurs , and to a certain extent ossetians etc. .
we have nothing to do with curries . absolutely nothing . we have no AASI and our s.indian score on harappaworld is 2.22 % on average so almost nothing . south asians have a shit ton of AASI and s.indian component . and on top of that we Kurds have a lot of mediterranean farmer and decent CHG which curries have little of . AND on top of that the climates of the inhabited lands are different which also has an effect on looks . we are nothing like pajeets really . this anthromyth needs to die already