This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
you can not call a billion people all unattractive . that would be bullshit .
if you mean that the pajeet look in general is not desired in the western world then this is correct . and the reason why pajeets look pajeet is mainly AASI / s.indian . if they didnt have AASI / s.indian north indians would look like tajik yagnhobis or something while south indians would look like whiter balochs
it is definitely not Iran N / Zagros N that makes them unattractive . Zagros is a very good looking component . and no i dont say this because we west asians have a lot of it . it really is a really nice looking component . sadly pajeets have given it a bad rep with their bullshit claims
it is definitely not Iran N / Zagros N that makes them unattractive . Zagros is a very good looking component . and no i dont say this because we west asians have a lot of it . it really is a really nice looking component . sadly pajeets have given it a bad rep with their bullshit claims
For example, would it be correct to give an example of a mulatto that is a mix of Spanish and SSA? This mix will not resemble modern spanish at all lol
these balochs and brahui are a decent proxy of what Zagros N / Iran N looked like . it is a very nice looking component
(first dude is heavily suntanned . he would be lighter without the tan . and he has a big beard . dont let that influence your judgment . his features are very Zagros N )