why white supremacists and iranian nationalists have such a hatred against Turks and Mongols ?

[Altaic Warrior]

they say disgusting crap they also say that Uyghurs are not indigenous there and in a site they said that they will make central asia indo-european aryan caucasoid white again what you guys think ? my fear is that ruzzia might invade Kazakhstan and the rest of Central Asia after Ukraine

 

[Altaic Warrior]

@MadMan @Maj313 @idklolimo @IberoTarasco

 

[Latinus]

Nobody gives a shit.

 

[Maj313]

Jealousy bro

 

[Altaic Warrior]

Jealousy bro

caucasoids iranian aryans got PWNED by the CHAD TURKIC NOMADS !! so they are butthurt to this day

 

[Ghty14]

caucasoids iranian aryans got PWNED by the CHAD TURKIC NOMADS !! so they are butthurt to this day

Brother, East Eurasians have been conquered and dominated by West Eurasians throughout history. Look at the attached Y-Haplogroup distributions of conquering Huns, Avars and other tribes. Majority West Eurasians. The same holds true for Scythians and Indo Europeans and Aryan tribes. They conquered all of Eurasia and the entire world. Even today the West is on top.

As for the Turks, they were majority West Eurasian when they arrived in West Asia, and they had admixed with Iranic and West Eurasians groups in Central Asia beforehand. They also had diverse ethnic groups under their banner and the East Eurasian admixed elite were a minority. Their prowess cannot be attributed to East Eurasian groups alone.

Also, the oldest and most complex civilizations and the oldest and largest empires are all West Eurasians. The legacy of the West Eurasians is unmatched in history.

 

[Altaic Warrior]

Brother, East Eurasians have been conquered and dominated by West Eurasians throughout history. Look at the attached Y-Haplogroup distributions of conquering Huns, Avars and other tribes. Majority West Eurasians. The same holds true for Scythians and Indo Europeans and Aryan tribes. They conquered all of Eurasia and the entire world. Even today the West is on top.

As for the Turks, they were majority West Eurasian when they arrived in West Asia, and they had admixed with Iranic and West Eurasians groups in Central Asia beforehand. They also had diverse ethnic groups under their banner and the East Eurasian admixed elite were a minority. Their prowess cannot be attributed to East Eurasian groups alone.

Also, the oldest and most complex civilizations and the oldest and largest empires are all West Eurasians. The legacy of the West Eurasians is unmatched in history.

View attachment 18111

i know Turkics and Mongolics had west-eurasian dna and still have some but didnt mongoloid turks conquered and colonized and raped west eurasian/caucasoids first ?

 

[Ghty14]

i know Turkics and Mongolics had west-eurasian dna and still have some but didnt mongoloid turks conquered and colonized and raped west eurasian/caucasoids first ?

This is a complicated answer. If you look at the beginnings of nomadic tribal warfare in the Steppes of Eurasia, you find that Iranic tribes were the original inhibitants of the region. Later on, they mixed with Afasanievo and Andronovo (EHG individuals). These were the two groups that primarily comprised the Scythians and Huns that were overlords of the Steppes and of much of Eurasia. In fact, the Tamga and other such cultural symbols and traditions of the proto-Turks are considered to be directly inherited from these nomadic Scythian and Iranic warring tribes and empires.

Therefore, the primacy of the hegemonic dominance of the region must be assigned to the West Eurasian groups (particularly the Iranian tribes). However, with the passage of time, neighboring Proto-Turkic East Eurasian tribes of Mongolian and Siberian descent for assimilated into their fold, and they became a multi-ethnic confederation with each subsequent generation.

The ethnic composition of the Elites was quite varied, but shows both West and East Eurasian influence, with the West Eurasian influence being heavier. In other words, the West Eurasians were the first conquerors, and the East Eurasians followed suit. The Mongols being the greatest of the East Eurasian invaders, and the Scythians/Indo Iranians/Aryans being the greatest of the Western Eurasian invaders.

However, in the grand scheme of things, the annals of history show that overall, West Eurasians had the largest and the most powerful empires. East Eurasians are a close second.

 

[Altaic Warrior]

This is a complicated answer. If you look at the beginnings of nomadic tribal warfare in the Steppes of Eurasia, you find that Iranic tribes were the original inhibitants of the region. Later on, they mixed with Afasanievo and Andronovo (EHG individuals). These were the two groups that primarily comprised the Scythians and Huns that were overlords of the Steppes and of much of Eurasia. In fact, the Tamga and other such cultural symbols and traditions of the proto-Turks are considered to be directly inherited from these nomadic Scythian and Iranic warring tribes and empires.

Therefore, the primacy of the hegemonic dominance of the region must be assigned to the West Eurasian groups (particularly the Iranian tribes). However, with the passage of time, neighboring Proto-Turkic East Eurasian tribes of Mongolian and Siberian descent for assimilated into their fold, and they became a multi-ethnic confederation with each subsequent generation.

The ethnic composition of the Elites was quite varied, but shows both West and East Eurasian influence, with the West Eurasian influence being heavier. In other words, the West Eurasians were the first conquerors, and the East Eurasians followed suit. The Mongols being the greatest of the East Eurasian invaders, and the Scythians/Indo Iranians/Aryans being the greatest of the Western Eurasian invaders.

However, in the grand scheme of things, the annals of history show that overall, West Eurasians had the largest and the most powerful empires. East Eurasians are a close second.

i see than i believe that yes the turks and mongols indeed conquered central asia and replaced the west eurasians in east-turkestan and central asia

 

[Ghty14]

i see than i believe that yes the turks and mongols indeed conquered central asia and replaced the west eurasians in east-turkestan and central asia

They didn’t replace them, so much as absorb them through mutual intermarriage (case in point, most of the men in Central Asian countries have West Eurasian Y-chromosomes to this day).

This means that the Proto Turks not only inherited the cultural legacy of their Iranic ancestors, but also their genes and heritage, culminating in the Turks of modern day.

 

[Altaic Warrior]

They didn’t replace them, so much as absorb them through mutual intermarriage (case in point, most of the men in Central Asian countries have West Eurasian Y-chromosomes to this day).

This means that the Proto Turks not only inherited the cultural legacy of their Iranic ancestors, but also their genes and heritage, culminating in the Turks of modern day.

Yeah but you know that Central Asian Turks (The Kipchak groups) are very mongoloid right ? Turkmens,Karluks are the most mixed in the region