What's new
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

post women you find attractive

KARABOĞA

Well-known member
Country
Turkey
btw turkish women maybe best looking in the whole asia i’m not saying this cuz i’m turkish. even i like a bit more eastern womens like levantine, kurdish, persian, armenian. this type of women also found in turkey but not that much.
 

Fuckerz

Moderator
Staff member
Country
Antarctica
If you posted a couple of the Turkish beauties as an example, that would be good to back up the claim. also, if you are going to post something, post women other than fuckeeer's crush.
 

Zagrosian_Tango

Moderator
Staff member
46202124cr.jpeg
 

Maj313

Well-known member
btw turkish women maybe best looking in the whole asia i’m not saying this cuz i’m turkish. even i like a bit more eastern womens like levantine, kurdish, persian, armenian. this type of women also found in turkey but not that much.
Turks aren’t Asians imo. Rank them among Europeans, not Asians.
 

Fuckerz

Moderator
Staff member
Country
Antarctica
Turks aren’t Asians imo. Rank them among Europeans, not Asians.
They have a shit ton of mongoloid admix for their whereabouts and they inhabit Western Asia for the most part. Why would you consider them European and not Asian
 

Maj313

Well-known member
They have a shit ton of mongoloid admix for their whereabouts and they inhabit Western Asia for the most part. Why would you consider them European and not Asian
That doesn’t matter, actually they have minor “mongoloid” but it also shows up in some other European populations especially Eastern Europeans whom Turks share quite a lot with. Also the Saami people are native to Northern European, pre-ice age Europeans probably looked more like them.

Anyways, I think Turks are European and they consider themselves so, they shouldn’t be grouped with Asians.
 

Fuckerz

Moderator
Staff member
Country
Antarctica
That doesn’t matter, actually they have minor “mongoloid” but it also shows up in some other European populations especially Eastern Europeans whom Turks share quite a lot with. Also the Saami people are native to Northern European, pre-ice age Europeans probably looked more like them.
They don't have minor mongoloid. Many have a decent chunk of it which differentiates them from any European group. And of course mongoloid matters. It's not like you find people in Europe with ease who are 5-17% mongoloid. Saami are basically Siberian genetically and they are completely isolated genetically even from contemporary North Europeans, let alone Europeans from other regions. Turks don't have kuch to do with East Europeans besides sharing ANF, EHG and CHG related ancestry. Neither do the two groups plot close to each other. I don't know about pre ice-age north euros but ice-age and post ice-age euros looked different from saami

Anyways, I think Turks are European and they consider themselves so, they shouldn’t be grouped with Asians.
In west Asia Turks are closest people to Europeans but that still not enough to consider them full blown Euros, especially since geographically much of turkey and much of turks live in Anatolia which is northern west asia. What do you mean by Asians.. do you mean east and central asians or what. If turks were to be ascribed to a specific region then in the end it would still be northern west asia and not europe
 

Fuckerz

Moderator
Staff member
Country
Antarctica
Also, Turks don't feel European..at least the majority don't as far as I know. They actually take pride in their oghuz heritage and sometimes even link themselves to altaic people lol
 
Top