KARABOĞA
Well-known member
- Country
-
Anthro World Forum
This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!
Kurdish People
- Thread starter FUCKEEER
- Start date
this is a hypotethical reconstruction of a man from the tiraleti culture
this is what they write about it :
"Genetically, the people of this culture would be closely related to the Caucasus HGs and Neolithic Iran genetic clusters. Trialetians are very likely to have expanded into other parts of Anatolia, where they caused a stark change in the Y-DNA makeup of the Anatolian HG. 4/6"
and :
"Not to be confused with the Trialetian Bronze Age culture."
so according to them at least this is what CHG and Iran N have looked like somewhat . i can imagine that CHG was a little lighter than this and Iran N a little darker
however it seems that they looked somewhat like this and it resembles the people who i posted before as how Iran N likely looked like .
Kurds are basically half this dude + half south european like Corsican or Kosovo Albanian or southeast French or Italian
this is what they write about it :
"Genetically, the people of this culture would be closely related to the Caucasus HGs and Neolithic Iran genetic clusters. Trialetians are very likely to have expanded into other parts of Anatolia, where they caused a stark change in the Y-DNA makeup of the Anatolian HG. 4/6"
and :
"Not to be confused with the Trialetian Bronze Age culture."
so according to them at least this is what CHG and Iran N have looked like somewhat . i can imagine that CHG was a little lighter than this and Iran N a little darker
however it seems that they looked somewhat like this and it resembles the people who i posted before as how Iran N likely looked like .
Kurds are basically half this dude + half south european like Corsican or Kosovo Albanian or southeast French or Italian
they dont say it was 50 50 . they say that they were in the same cluster
so Iran N looked similar to this and CHG probably a little lighter
this is the hypo construction of darkveti who are very much like modern Georgians
and hypo CHG reconstruction : https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FoIj8TFWIAElhnB?format=jpg&name=medium
- Country
-
That's not what i meant. I Was referring to your corsican&iran_n model. Trialeti forager would have been more "northern" than iran_n from wezmeh or something and that would alter your 1/2/1/2 model.
Iran_N was probably more exotic, don't forget about the natufian and AASI shift of iran_n. Trialeti forager would have had less of that shift in relation to CHG.
Skin color aside, there should have been cranial differences among these people too.
If this hypothetical reconstruction is true, then i was wrong about CHG looking extremely similar to modern day balkans. As I said I believed that CHG was more similar to balkans than modern georgians are in terms of appearance. Anyway, i wouldn't expect Caucasus hunter gatherers from Last glacial maximum era Georgia to have looked like this, more on the exotic side. I Thought they would have looked whiter, more balkan like.
yes but Iran N still look similar
bro you exeggerate that shift . as i said before it is like this basically :
CHG ---------Iran N ------------------------------------------Natufian-------------------------------------------------------------------AASI
for sure Iran N was darker than CHG . but let us not exeggerate it . Iran N was probably similar to this Trialeti . maybe slightly darker while CHG was a little lighter than Trialeti
well i do think he looks balkanoid . but dont forget that ancients are ancients and not modern people
- Country
-
It did but it would have been more exotic.
How am i exaggerating the shift. Compared to CHG, Iran_N was quarter natufian and AASI shifted.
Being quarter natufian+AASI shifted and living in a warmer climate would make iran_N moderately swarthier. For example, Iran_N would be to CHG as Saudis are to me in terms of appearance.Triateli was an intermediary or maybe slightly more CHG tilted. For example some levantines, mainly southern ones.
He looks nowhere near as balkanoid as I would expect given what CHG represents genetically.
you do exeggerate the effect of that shift tbh
hey posted tthis today . hypo iran N reconsttruction . darker but not much darker than CHG
hey posted tthis today . hypo iran N reconsttruction . darker but not much darker than CHG
Last edited:
- Country
-
Am not.
It would make no sense that CHG+1/4 Natufian &AASI people would be only marginally more exotic than CHG.
look at us Kurds . if Iran N was more exotic we wouldnt look the way we do
- Country
-
You guys also have steppe, CHG separately and a lot of med
yes but still . we have a lot of Iran N . if Iran N was more exotic then we would look different
i am pretty sure that Iran N looked very similar to non curryoid looking Balochs / Makran Balochs / Brahuis . like Balochs who dont look like they are effected by AASI
like these :
- Country
-
By that logic natufian wasn't exotic af either, because i've got a lot of it and I don't look THAT exotic for west asian standards. But we know that natufian was extremely exotic, since the dudes didn't even have a single allele for light skin, no mutation whatsoever. Regardless they were ugly people according to the cranio-morphological assessments done by anthropologists.
natufians were swarthy fucks but not THAT exotic . look at lebanese people etc. . they have a lot of natufian