What's new
Anthro World Forum

This is an anthropology forum where we cover all sorts of topics and discussions. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts. Register today to become a member!

final proof that Iran_N / Zagrosian Neolithic is NOT a very dark or south asian like component . important thread please read it !

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
people who say that zagros_neolithic looked south asian and / or say that it is the zagros that makes north indians dark and exotic looking : they need to explain why we Kurds are a lot whiter than many balkan gypsies . and why balkan gypsies often look dark and exotic and indianesque despite having more EHG and less Zagros than us Kurds

i made a new G25 model that is very accurate . it shows hidden zagros and the components dont eat up each other much . this makes the fit for most people a little worse but that is more accurate than having an overfit

this is what Kurds score :



Target: Kurdish_KurmanjiTurkey(n=182)
Distance: 2.9911% / 0.02991099
34.2 Northwest_Anatolia_Barcin_Neolithic
32.8 Zagros_Neolithic
16.4 CHG_Georgia_Kotias.SG
9.6 East_European_Hunter_Gatherer
6.2 Natufian

0.8 East_Eurasian



this is what balkan gypsies score :

Target: Roma_Balkans

Distance: 2.1576% / 0.02157607
35.2 Northwest_Anatolia_Barcin_Neolithic
20.2 Zagros_Neolithic
17.2 East_European_Hunter_Gatherer
14.6 AASI
9.0 CHG_Georgia_Kotias.SG
3.6 Natufian

0.2 WHG



as you see our Barcin is the same . we Kurds score 13% more Zagros and the gypsies have more EHG and even less natufian than us .

why do they look like this then :


49717188zh.jpg


49717189hp.jpg


49717190ix.jpg


49717191vw.jpg


49717192qr.jpg


49717193aa.jpg


49717194rj.jpg


49717195fk.jpg


49717196xx.jpg


49717197hb.jpg


49717198gc.jpg


49717199mx.jpg


49717200ei.jpg


49717201em.jpeg


49717202gw.jpg
 
Last edited:

Kurdquistador

Moderator
Staff member
and these are DNA tested Kurdish faces : why do we look like this then ? why are we a lot whiter than gypsies ? and no we are not cherrypicked you scumbags :


full Kurdish gallery with THOUSANDS of Kurds :


so why do we not look like the gypsies ? why are we a lot whiter ? why do we not look like south asians if zagros is like what many idiots claim ?
when will you finally understand that you are wrong ? what else do you need ? how much more proof ?
and yes i am aware that there are also gypsies who look european . but many gypsies look exotic and south aisan shifted . while we Kurds look like what you see in the threads i linked
as you see our Barcin is the same . we Kurds score 13% more Zagros and the gypsies have more EHG and even less natufian than us .

it is NOT zagros that makes south asians and gypsies dark and exotic looking . it is the fucking AASI . Zagros N is just a swarthier version of CHG (which peaks in west Georgians) .

give me a fucking break

and before you say "buut buut zagros peaks in balochs and they are dark" . first of all there are also many balochs who are not very dark and exotic looking . and 2. balochs have around 8% AASI on average which is more than enough to darken them . yes it is enough you scumbag . also i ran balochs individually and some are 11 - 13 % AASI .

it is the WHITER balochs who dont show AASI on their phenotype who can somewhat be taken as a proxy for Iran_N / Zagros . NOT the south asian shifted ones (they are south asian shifted due to AASI not Zagros_N)
 
Top