Search results

maybe you should spread some assyrian ass bro in exchange

Not even close dawg.. not even close. Keep in mind that the modeling below is similar how Kurdish average would get modeled on illustrativeDNA. It's basically the same model as the one used for modeling this Assyrian with 20% Natufian Target: Kurdish Distance: 2.8576% / 0.02857600 33.8...

Who's swarthier between Bandaris and Baloch in your opinion

Of course not but are these people Bandari or Baloch?

😊 Distance to: Fuckerz_scaled 0.04358749 Alevi_Dersim 0.04457999 Kurdish 0.04833040 Ezid

If we were to pay for IllustartiveDNA model this is similar to how we would get modeled there Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 3.8546% / 0.03854599 39.8 Anatolian_Neolithic_Farmer 28.6 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer 22.6 Zagros_Neolithic_Farmer 8.6 Natufian_Hunter_Gatherer 0.4 EHG...

People on reddit are clueless quacks in r/phenotypes. They believe that Levantines are the whitest people in West Asia and that they are Eastern extension of Italians as kaburga said. they view kurds as western punjabis on the other hand. anyway they are retarded so you should not take them too...

btw my Davidski modeling Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 2.2274% / 0.02227385 64.4 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps 13.4 Levant_PPNB 12.0 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N 7.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N 2.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara 0.2 BRA_LapaDoSanto_9600BP

just lol

wtf.. you criticized the previous natufian source for having ANF shift so I used the other Natufian sample that was more pure and now that you are still dissatisfied with your Natufian score you are calling the model bad. levant_PPNB has a fuck ton of ANF in it so if you have a problem with...

haha

They were negroid

With the old natufian you still have 5-5.6% more Natufian than us

I substituted the two Natufian samples from the model with the older Natufian sample. The fits got worse but anyway.. Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 3.7952% / 0.03795171 37.6 Early_European_Farmer 28.8 Caucasus_HG 23.4 Zagros_Farmer 9.4 Levant_Epipaleolithic 0.8 EHG Target...

My bad.. the second Natufian does have slight EEF shift compared to the older natufian Target: Levant_Epipaleolithic:Natufian:Israel_Natufian_d Distance: 3.9776% / 0.03977573 93.2 Levant_Natufian 6.4 Early_European_Farmer 0.4 Taforalt

I don't think that either of the natufians have ANF shift. It's rather that the EEF from that model does not swallow Natufian unlike Barcin. Stop coping bro. Me and Kaburga also get higher Natufian with this model but the fits are also better. It is what it is

pmd it

the difference in Natufian between you, me and Kaburga with a model that gives better fits is 6-7%. As I said this model is not as good as the one I used. you are just trying to complicate things because you don't like the fact that you have more Natufian with a better model

Fits are worse for you and me with this model and I don't like to add steppe in HG/Farmer models anyway. The modelings I posted initially are better Target: Fuckerz_scaled Distance: 4.1277% / 0.04127662 40.4 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmer_TUR_Barcin_N 27.0 Caucasus_Hunter-Gatherer_GEO_CHG...

are you tweaking? the fit with the modeling I posted is better than the one you posted